[Technogeeb]

I will expose a person's intent to deceive readers where I find it, thank you very much. See post 904.

Yes, post 904, where you claim that a calculation based on an arbitrary "poverty level" is a safeguard instead of the flaw it quite clearly is, and called my pointing out your intellectual folly "dishonest" and "failed character development".

The system that you are advocating is fundamentally flawed, and it is your refusal to accept those flaws which shows that you are the one being intellectually dishonest, perhaps even to yourself. You still refuse to admit that a government handout (regardless of the actual amount) delivered to every household in the United States is socialism.

[Zon]

Yes, post 904, where you claim that a calculation based on an arbitrary "poverty level" is a safeguard instead of the flaw it quite clearly is, and called my pointing out your intellectual folly "dishonest" and "failed character development".

You erroneously claim it is arbitrary. It's not arbitrary. (arbitrary: Based on or subject to individual discretion or preference or sometimes impulse or caprice) As I wrote in post 904:

"According to your "logic" they can do whatever they want [arbitrary].  Thus they can do whatever they want with your preferred plan too. For with any plan you propose they can simply say the _______ (fill in the blank) level is __________ (fill in the blank). For example, they can simply say a 99% income tax will be withheld from all paychecks where the person's annual  income level is $10,000 or more." 904

But I have digressed to catering to you. Not to worry, I'll get over it.

You demonstrated your intent to deceive the reader. Thus rendering yourself not to be trusted or respected because you disrespect the reader. You probably think you can mislead and try to deceive the reader and that they should just comply with you and answer your questions or take you seriously. You deserve no person's attention in a discussion. Scorn. That's what you deserve.