Egads, not that! He be runnin' a way.
Redistribution means to reallocate, which is exactly what you two leftists are proposing; to collect money via the tax system and then hand a portion of it back out equally among every household. That you cannot see that such a scheme is socialism only shows how much your minds are diseased by collectivist thought.
Zon: Egads, not that! He be runnin' a way. 1003
That you cannot see that such a scheme is socialism only shows how much your minds are diseased by collectivist thought.
You're wrong again. That's nothing new or unusual coming from you, Technogeeb.
Speaking of diseased minds...
Technogeeb: Robert Reich, Clinton's secretary of labor, has admitted that the administration didn't adjust the poverty level during the Clinton administration for fear that it would make the poverty rate would look worse. Check out the May 26, 2001 issue of the New York times for proof of his statement. 942
Robert Reich admitted that the administration didn't adjust the poverty level??? Hmmm...
Technogeeb: If "falsifying poverty level" numbers were really a crime capable of being prosecuted, then show me a conviction. There is more than enough evidence (and even a "confession" by Robert Reich in the New York Times that the Clinton administration did that specifically) 973
More than enough evidence??? Hmmm...
Why have you shown no evidence??? Hmmm...
Claiming there's an article in The New York Times that backs up your claim is not evidence. It's a second claim -- a claim on top of a claim. Hmmm...
Technogeeb: I've already mentioned statements by Clinton administration officials (and where those statements can be found) admitting to manipulation of the numbers for political purposes. What more evidence do you need that the "poverty level" is subject to manipulation by the bureaucracy? 986
You keep saying things like "there is more than enough evidence" and "what more evidence do you need" -- yet you haven't posted a 'lick' of evidence to support your claim. Hmmm...
If there's supposedly an abundance of evidence available how come you haven't posted any of it??? Hmmm...
What more evidence does a person need??? Hmmm...
More than zero. Hmmm...
With that one May 21, 2001 New York Times article being your only claim of evidence you assert that that's more than enough evidence to prove that "the administration didn't adjust the poverty level during the Clinton administration" and further assert that it's more than enough evidence for the reader to base his or her decision on??? Hmmm....
Technogeeb: Until you can show me a picture of Robert Reich in prison (or indeed, suffering any punishment whatsoever) for committing the "crime" to which he confessed (May 26, 2001, New York Times) 974
You want Robert Reich imprisoned or to suffer punishment for committing the "crime"??? Hmmm...
Why is crime in quotes??? Hmmm..
Wouldn't it be an inversion of justice -- an injustice -- to imprison a person that didn't commit a crime??? Hmmm...
Robert Reich went on the record with The New York Times and confessed that he committed a crime -- a federal crime??? Hmmm...
Is the NYT the laughing stock of failed credibility that doesn't warrant the government arresting Robert Reich for the crime he openly confessed to and put on record at the NYT??? Hmmm...
Could it be that Robert Reich never confessed to the NYT that he committed a crime??? Hmmm...
Technogeeb, do you want me to post the May 26, 2001 New York Times article or would you like to post it so you can correct your many errors? ...Knowing that by you taking the initiative you may manage to save what little credibility you have left.