Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodBlesBush
No. I understand that the Constitution limits Senators to a 6 year term and Carnahan's succesor would serve more than 6 years.
27 posted on 11/05/2002 9:04:24 PM PST by PolishProud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: PolishProud
I understand that the Constitution limits Senators to a 6 year term and Carnahan's succesor would serve more than 6 years.

This is a special election. Remember, Carnahan wasn't elected to her seat; she was appointed because her husband died. If her husband hadn't died, the seat wouldn't even be up for grabs right now. This election is to determine who gets to finish the remainder of the husband's term. The seat will be up for election again in 2006.

46 posted on 11/05/2002 9:47:09 PM PST by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: PolishProud
Not so. In this case Carnahan was appointed to fill a vacancy to the Senate. Her dead husband was elected as senator. Once a senator elect is determined by the voters then he, in this case, immediately fills the seat. It is different in MN since Ventura named a senator to fill the vacancy of Wellstone whose term exspires in January. The difference being that Wellstone was an elected setting senator. Ventura could have waited until after the election and named the winner to be seated immediately to fill the vacancy. But of course, he thought it would be Mondale, therefore he sought to screw the dem's for their sickening rally at Wellstones memorial.
55 posted on 11/05/2002 10:08:23 PM PST by rstevens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson