Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Truth Telling Guy
The problem is with computerized voting we the citizens have no way of independently verifying the vote count or even proving computerized vote fraud.

Electronic systems can be designed to be extremely resistant against fraud, moreso even than paper ballots [though the paper-electronic hybrids are probably best]. Unfortunately, many systems use flash memory or other storage technologies which may be altered without a trace.

15 posted on 11/05/2002 4:42:18 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
Electronic systems can be designed to be extremely resistant against fraud......

Not if the programmers(designers) are involved in the fraud and no one from the public has access to the computer codes and programs(as the situation is now).
18 posted on 11/05/2002 5:59:08 PM PST by Truth Telling Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson