Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'ALL ABOUT ABORTION'
The Buffalo News ^ | November 4, 2002 | Dan Herbeck, News Staff Reporter

Posted on 11/04/2002 3:37:36 PM PST by Marianne

Defense lawyer Bruce A. Barket makes no secret of his admiration for his new client, James C. Kopp.

"People like Jim should be exalted in this country," Barket said of Kopp, the accused sniper killer of Dr. Barnett A. Slepian. "Jim is a devout Christian, a kind, gentle man who only acts after thinking and praying on things. He backs up his beliefs by putting his own life on the line."

Kopp's murder trial is months away, but such comments are already igniting anger among family members and friends of Slepian, who was fatally shot while at home with his wife and four sons in October 1998.

Some in the pro-choice community fear that Barket's recent entry into the case could move the focus away from a horrific murder and turn Kopp's trial into a public debate over abortion.

"I think it's going to be a mess," said Helen Dalley, president of the Pro Choice Network of Western New York. "Is James Kopp going to get up on the witness stand and say, "God told me to do this'?"

In fact, some legal sources close to the case think that Barket may now be preparing a defense that admits that Kopp pulled the trigger but that tries to convince jurors that Kopp acted out of moral outrage and a sense of duty to protect the unborn.

"I hope the judges don't allow Mr. Barket to turn this case into a debate over abortion," Dalley said. "There are other places for that debate. This is a murder case. We don't need more unrest in this community about abortion."

If his words upset some people, Barket said, he can live with that. The attorney from Long Island is no stranger to controversy, and he said he intends to pull no punches in his defense of Kopp when the murder case goes to trial next year in Erie County Court.

Tuesday, Judge Michael L. D'Amico approved Kopp's request to replace Buffalo defense lawyer Paul J. Cambria Jr. with Barket. A similar request is pending in federal court, where Kopp faces related charges.

Sources in the legal community said Kopp wants Barket to represent him because Barket shares his anti-abortion views and because Barket wants to build Kopp's defense around the moral debate over abortion.

In Barket's view, it is impossible to fairly evaluate Kopp's guilt or innocence without also looking at the issue of abortion.

"Whether people want to hear it or not, this case is all about abortion," Barket said. "It's a sign of a twisted society that our government wants to put a man like Jim in prison . . . while allowing more than a million babies each year to be killed in abortions."

When asked whether Kopp is planning to take the witness stand and admit to firing the shot that killed Slepian, Barket declined to answer.

"Come to the trial and find out," he said. "The case will unfold as it unfolds. This the wrong time for me to unveil our trial strategy."

In the courts of Long Island and New York City, Barket is known as a formidable trial attorney with a willingness to take on controversial cases. In the last decade, his clients have included Amy Fisher, the "Long Island Lolita"; Salvatore "Fat Sally" Scala, an accused enforcer for the late Mafia don John Gotti; and Antowine Butts, a New York City rap singer whom Barket helped to win acquittals on two murder charges.

Many of Barket's clients are poor people. He has defended so many clients for free that the New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers will give him its Gideon Award next year for representing people who cannot afford to pay.

Barket's combative courtroom style has raised some eyebrows in Buffalo, especially those of U.S. District Judge Richard J. Arcara, who has exchanged some angry words with the lawyer.

Colleagues describe Barket as an outspoken crusader who fights hard for all his clients.

"Bruce is no shrinking violet," said his friend Richard J. Barbuto, president-elect of the statewide lawyers group. "I may not agree with his politics, but I admire the way he does things when he feels strongly about a case. He represents his clients with no holds barred, often receiving little or no money."

"He is a very skilled trial attorney," Kathleen Cruise, a law clerk and former Nassau County prosecutor, said of Barket. "After seeing him in action, one of our local judges once told me, "If I ever was charged with murder, I would hire that guy.' "

While Barket is proud of his opposition to abortion, he becomes upset when reports in the Buffalo news media refer to him as a "pro-life attorney" or "anti-abortion attorney."

"I'm absolutely opposed to abortion, but I'm a defense lawyer who handles all kinds of cases," Barket said. "It marginalizes the work I do to call me a "pro-life lawyer.' The cases I've had involving pro-life issues make up a minuscule part of my practice."

Barket, a devout Catholic of Lebanese and Italian heritage, worked from 1986 to 1991 as a prosecutor for the Nassau County district attorney's office. Then he quit the legal profession to study for the priesthood. He said he returned to legal work less than a year later, after realizing he could best help others as a defense lawyer.

"As a Jesuit seminarian, I was doing some volunteer work in the jails, and a middle-aged black guy in work clothes came to me and said, "My son is in trouble. He's charged in a drug case. Can you help me?' " recalled Barket, 43. "I started looking into the case, and I found that this kid was being mistreated. I found myself working as a lawyer again."

Barket said he is somewhat embarrassed that he ever worked as a prosecutor, putting people in jail. Since becoming a defense lawyer, he said, he has handled many cases where he has caught police officers or government lawyers lying in efforts to put innocent people in jail.

"If Jesus Christ ever came back to life on earth, I don't think he would be a prosecutor. He'd be more likely to be a defense lawyer, helping people who are begging for forgiveness," Barket said.

"Bruce has a real sensitivity to any kind of social injustice," said Nassau County District Attorney Denis E. Dillon, who is also known for his strong opposition to abortion. "He feels that every defendant is entitled to the best possible representation. Out of hundreds of lawyers in this community, he's among the five or six best."

When Cambria took the Kopp case in June 2001, he made one thing clear: He would attack the prosecution team's evidence and would not - under any circumstances - allow Kopp's trial to become a battle over abortion.

"This is a murder case," Cambria told The Buffalo News last summer. "I'm not about to turn this thing into a debate over abortion . . . I don't work that way."

Barket sees it much differently.

"The issue that is going to be squarely presented in this case is the impropriety and the immorality of abortion," he said. "Our government is brutal in its protection of abortionists."

Those words put him on a collision course with Erie County District Attorney Frank J. Clark, whose office is prosecuting the murder case.

"Whatever Mr. Kopp and Mr. Barket think about abortion is immaterial. The issue of this trial is going to be whether Kopp killed Dr. Slepian," Clark said. "It will be up to Judge D'Amico to decide how much latitude to give the defense, but if they try to turn this into a political debate, we will object to every question."

When asked about the possibility he may try to convince jurors that Kopp acted out of moral outrage and wanted to protect the unborn, Barket said: "The only things I would rule out in our defense strategy are lies, deception and trying to ignore the fact that this case is about abortion. Why do you think Dr. Slepian was shot? What was the motivation? Whoever sat there and pulled the trigger, . . . this was not done as a robbery."

Clark was outraged to hear that Barket described Kopp as a heroic figure. "We'll see how the jury looks at it," Clark said. "As far as I'm concerned, this was one of the most heinous, cowardly crimes I've ever seen."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionlist; kopp; malvasi; marra; slepian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
FYI
1 posted on 11/04/2002 3:37:36 PM PST by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Marianne
I thought they had a very good case that Kopp couldn't have pulled the trigger because the timeline was wrong.
2 posted on 11/04/2002 3:39:40 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marianne
wonderful, once again the prolife movement delivers another self inflicted blow to it's credibility
3 posted on 11/04/2002 3:42:16 PM PST by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marianne
Clark was outraged to hear that Barket described Kopp as a heroic figure. "We'll see how the jury looks at it," Clark said. "As far as I'm concerned, this was one of the most heinous, cowardly crimes I've ever seen."

Added Clark: "If he had only courageously and bravely suctioned out an infant's brains in exchange for cash, he wouldn't be in the mess he's in now."

4 posted on 11/04/2002 3:42:55 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marianne
I am baffled.

But, it's Jim's call, I guess. I sent some money to the defense fund when Cambria had the case. The article indicates that the new attorney is a heavy hitter, as well.

What do others think?

5 posted on 11/04/2002 3:48:10 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Why do you think Dr. Slepian was shot? What was the motivation? Whoever sat there and pulled the trigger, . . . this was not done as a robbery."

Kopp is guilty as hell, and the trial is going to be turned into an OJ circus.

6 posted on 11/04/2002 3:52:08 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Correct. This is becoming a circus and we pro-lifers will be portrayed as approving the murder.
7 posted on 11/04/2002 3:54:12 PM PST by BfloGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: don-o
I didn't read in this article that the defense is justifiable homicide. I think that this lawyer assumes that there will be some prodeath soccer moms on his jury and he has to counter that somehow. It would be horrible if they tried to cover up and be embarrassed by Kopps' prolife position. He has to confront it head on. Wait and see.
8 posted on 11/04/2002 3:54:27 PM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Marianne
Keep in mind that the source is a pro-abort newspaper and therefore is not reliable. I think that Brian Kopp was framed by the clinton/reno FBI because they were looking for another scapegoat to demonize pro-lifers and the so-called Christian right.

In other words, they did it in order to generate useful pro-abort PR. Now they're very upset because Kopp's lawyer is coming out with sympathetic details about Kopp that may make the pro-aborts look bad instead. Kopp's first lawyer had a policy of saying nothing publicly and approaching it as a strictly legal issue. The new lawyer wants to use PR. If the pro-aborts are whining and screaming, that's probably a good sign.

As I understand it, the judge said that Kopp couldn't dismiss his first lawyer, but now has TWO lawyers. Seems good to me. As numerous high-profile cases have shown, you need to use PR as well as every legal trick in cases like this. I doubt whether Kopp intends to plead guilty or admit that he did it, because I don't believe he did do it. He is widely known as a prayerful and devout pro-lifer very unlikely to resort to violence. Instead, he simply wants to go public. It could backfire, but it's no riskier than keeping your mouth shut while the FBI frames you. If O.J. could go public and get off, surely an innocent man can use a few pages from the same PR playbook.
9 posted on 11/04/2002 3:56:53 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Kopp is guilty as hell, and the trial is going to be turned into an OJ circus.

Sink, there is a lot of evidence already out there to the contrary. And a lot of evidence of yet another botched investigation by the FBI.

I am wondering if Kopp considers it his "higher calling" to use this highest profile trial ever, as far as pro-life, as a platform for putting the reality of the unborn holocaust squarely in the face of Joe and Josaphine Six-Pack on the Nightly News.

10 posted on 11/04/2002 4:02:48 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: don-o
In fact, some legal sources close to the case think that Barket may now be preparing a defense that admits that Kopp pulled the trigger but that tries to convince jurors that Kopp acted out of moral outrage and a sense of duty to protect the unborn.
Until this change of lawyers I never entertained the thought that James Kopp had "pulled the trigger". I believed the evidence would prove his innocence.
I too am baffled.
This is the first article that gives some of Mr. Barket's background. However, I would be more comfortable if Mr. Cambria was handling his defense.
"Moral outrage" and "protecting the unborn" does not justify cold-blooded murder. The local jury will not be sympathetic.
11 posted on 11/04/2002 4:04:08 PM PST by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
They've already run the murder tally on Mr. Muhammad and Mr. Malvo up to 13, and most authorities report that they expect to find more such murders.

A single headshot by a sniper who then gets away clean - sounds to me like Slepian might well have been taken out by Mr. Muhammid on a "test run" and not by "Atomic Dog".

One thing for sure, the FBI will not investigate that possibility!

12 posted on 11/04/2002 4:08:51 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Marianne
"Moral outrage" and "protecting the unborn" does not justify cold-blooded murder. The local jury will not be sympathetic.

Thanks for the original post, Marianne.

But, the "necessity defense" is what is in play here. That means, that it is permissable, or even necessary to violate the law to prevent greater harm. The classic example is ignoring a "No Trespassing" sign on a fence around a swimming pool to save someone who is drowning.

The parallel for Kopp might be ignoring the law against first degree murder, in order to stop however many premediated murders that Slepian could be counted to commit, by his appointment book.

13 posted on 11/04/2002 4:11:22 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
As I understand it, the judge said that Kopp couldn't dismiss his first lawyer, but now has TWO lawyers. The State agreed, but the Federal hasn't decided as yet.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott said he will not decide until at least Nov. 12 whether Kopp and his friend, anti-abortion activist Loretta C. Marra, can be represented on federal charges by the same attorney.
Kopp faces state murder charges in Erie County Court, where his trial is expected to begin in February. In that case, Barket already has been approved as Cambria's replacement by County Judge Michael L. D'Amico.(state charges) LINK

14 posted on 11/04/2002 4:19:22 PM PST by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: don-o
General question: The news media are always talking about "violence against abortion providers" as a form of right-wing terrorism (in their "equivalency" view). This is the one and only direct murder of an abortion doctor, isn't it? Or almost the one and only?
15 posted on 11/04/2002 4:20:18 PM PST by MoralSense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Sink, there is a lot of evidence already out there to the contrary.

The only evidence I'd need was his fleeing the country.

I am wondering if Kopp considers it his "higher calling" to use this highest profile trial ever, as far as pro-life, as a platform for putting the reality of the unborn holocaust squarely in the face of Joe and Josaphine Six-Pack on the Nightly News.

You and I had better hope not. If Kopp chooses this strategy, he will set the pro-life movement back twenty years.

16 posted on 11/04/2002 4:22:30 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MoralSense
This is the one and only direct murder of an abortion doctor, isn't it? Or almost the one and only?

There was another, in Florida, where the perp is currently on death row.

17 posted on 11/04/2002 4:26:14 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
A single headshot by a sniper who then gets away clean - sounds to me like Slepian might well have been taken out by Mr. Muhammid on a "test run" and not by "Atomic Dog".
Dr. Slepian was murdered October 23, 1998 and there were several other attacks on abortion doctors.
James Kopp is considered a suspect in these other cases as well.
Police in Canada have charged Kopp with a shooting that wounded an abortion provider in Hamilton, Ont., and he is considered the prime suspect in three other unsolved shootings aimed at abortion doctors. LINK
18 posted on 11/04/2002 4:32:59 PM PST by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/782257/posts?page=1 has a lot of stuff about Al-Fuqra, including their activities in Toronto.

Although the pro-aborts are of the impression that only a RTL type would want to kill one of their doctors, that's only because they are all dull, bovine types. Slepian could have tangled with these guys, and that would be it. They have been busy over the years in that part of the world. They should not be dismissed as the cause.

19 posted on 11/04/2002 4:33:41 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Marianne
See my next immediate link after your response to me. Or, try: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/782257/posts?page=1
20 posted on 11/04/2002 4:35:13 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson