[Sabertooth]

Certain people get on my case for telling what I see, but it looks like the text was carved into the stone a long time after the stone was first cut. The text is fresh and clean, the surface looks worn or eroded.

Are we talking about this pic?

Actually, it looks doctored to me. The resolution seems crisper on the inscription, and the highlights are too bright and the shadows too dark, when compared to the surface of the ossuary.

The rock face is smother and brighter at the top left of the pic and darker and more pitted at the bottom right. Yet the brightest highlights and darkest shadows are in the middle, on the inscription.

I think that's more a testimony to Photoshop than the freshness (one way or the other) of the inscription. I could be wrong.

[RightWhale]

That's it, although it seemes to be an enhanced version of the image, perhaps with false color imagery as well. The inscription seems to be much less eroded than the stone matrix. Comparing to old tombstones, where the stone is eroded away until the lettering disappears altogether, this seems to be weathered stone with recent text scratched into the surface.