Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: berned
THIRD time asking Polycarp a simple question which he has thus far refused to answer:

For the last week you have spent much time trumpeting this ossuary as authentic and as one that crushes that Catholic position on Mary.

Scriptural explanations of differing thoughts have taken up multiple threads, as a result of this ossuary.

I have posted a thread that refutes the authenticity of the ossuary.

You had your chance to crow.

Now refute posts 1, 5, 131, and 206...

AND STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT!!!

yOU KNOW YOUR OSSUARY HAS BEEN DISPROVEN, SO YOU'RE SIMPLY TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT.

No more theological questions from you till you refute posts 1, 5, 131, and 206.

Stop trying to run away and trying to change the subject, Berned.

And simply assassinating the character of the author does NOT REFUTE his arguments in post 1, and neither have you addressed posts 5, 131, nor 206.

226 posted on 11/01/2002 2:42:12 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]


To: Polycarp
I'm not changing the subject. Your belief about James hinges on there being only two James's. The son of Zebedee and Salome, and the son of Alphaeus and Mary.

I'm just asking you if you think the James mentioned as JESUS' BROTHER in Mark 6:3 (directly relating to THIS TOPIC -- THE OSSUARY) is the son of ALPHAEUS.

You refuse, for some reason, to type a simple Yes or no.

If the Mark 6:3 James is neither the son of Zebedee OR the son of Alphaeus -- THEN WHO IS HE?????

231 posted on 11/01/2002 2:47:49 PM PST by berned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson