Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: berned
That seems to be what you are saying. Do I have that correct?

I have said nothing regarding this point. I simply ignored you.

What say you polycarp?

This thread is about the relative authenticity of the ossuary. Refute post 131. Thanks.

I will not answer any further theological questions on this thread from you. Don't bother asking, and don't bother trying to put words in my mouth.

Refute post 131.

219 posted on 11/01/2002 2:32:34 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]


To: Polycarp
I will not answer any further theological questions on this thread from you. Don't bother asking, and don't bother trying to put words in my mouth.

I KNEW IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You're as slippery as Bill Clinton!!!!

At least Campion is man enough to state publicly what he thinks and believes.

YOU ARE NOT!!!!!!!!!!!

But I will try one last time. In YOUR post to me, # 128, you said:

Yeah, like you run away from the clear proof that James the Just was the son of Alphaeus, not Joseph.

Since you believe there were only TWO James's mentioned in the NT, and James and John were the sons of Zebedee and Salome, I asked you if the James mentioned in Mark 6:3 whose brothers were ALL NAMED (Joses, Jude, and Simon -- for now let's leave Jesus out for the sake of clarity) I asked you if you believe this James, mentioned in Mark 6:3 is the son of Clopas/ALPHAEUS.

In your note # 128 you seemed to indicate you believe these ARE the sons of ALPHAEUS.

Yes or no?

227 posted on 11/01/2002 2:43:20 PM PST by berned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson