Skip to comments.
Is Stanley to Allard as Nader was to Gore?
Rocky Mountain News ^
| 11-1-02
| By M.E. Sprengelmeyer
Posted on 11/01/2002 10:07:17 AM PST by AdamSelene235
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
IT'S FOUR DAYS 'TIL THE ELECTION
WANNA HELP ME TAKE BACK THE SENATE?
TakeBackCongress.org
A resource for conservatives who want a Republican Senate
2
posted on
11/01/2002 10:11:59 AM PST
by
ffrancone
To: AdamSelene235
Republicans always whine about third parties when their candidates lose (so do Democrats.)
To: AdamSelene235; xsmommy; VaBthang4
4
posted on
11/01/2002 10:15:20 AM PST
by
hobbes1
To: hobbes1; VaBthang4
that never fails to make me LMAO....: )
5
posted on
11/01/2002 10:16:18 AM PST
by
xsmommy
To: AdamSelene235
Stanley's working as hard as he can for the Democrats.
6
posted on
11/01/2002 10:17:28 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Stanley's working as hard as he can for the Democrats. Its odd that Allard has started pushing windmills. Why is he more interested in wooing the Greens than the Libs?
To: hobbes1
That funny.
To: AdamSelene235
9
posted on
11/01/2002 10:27:06 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: AdamSelene235
Rick Stanley -- wasn't he a half brother of the Republican Elvis Presley? Or is this someone else?
To: AdamSelene235; VaBthang4
The Credit goes to VaBthang4
11
posted on
11/01/2002 10:32:44 AM PST
by
hobbes1
To: Roscoe
Backwards. Stanley has allied himself with the Greens. Allard looked me in the eye and tried to BS me on the viability of wind farms. Naturally, he has no problem picking my pocket to pay for such nonsense.
To: AdamSelene235
"It is theoretically possible," said pollster Paul Talmey. "It ultimately could affect whether Democrats have a majority. Maybe the whole universe tilts on Rick Stanley." To me it seems more than theoretically possible. It seems pretty likely. Maybe Wayne Allard can hurry up in the next five days and find a nice, appealing middle ground between Conservative and Libertarian.
13
posted on
11/01/2002 10:34:09 AM PST
by
tdadams
To: AdamSelene235
"As the Greens and Libertarians socialized after the forum, many were overheard expressing their willingness to support each other in races where both parties do not field candidates. Members of both parties feel the Democrats and Republicans are corrupt, and are pandering to big corporations while failing to protect the average American citizens constitutionally guaranteed rights." -- Press release from Rick Stanley
14
posted on
11/01/2002 10:35:40 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: AdamSelene235
"Its odd that Allard has started pushing windmills. Why is he more interested in wooing the Greens than the Libs?" Because both Allard and Strickland (and Stanley) have pinned down their bases but have made little headway among independents, who are mainly undecided. Touchy feely green stuff sells well to independents. The problem is that late deciding undecideds usually swing to the challenger. Allard's in trouble.
To: hobbes1
There you go ... posting the truth again.
The truth is when the fringe left and the fringe right have candidates their followers vote for their candidates. When they don't have candidates, they either don't vote or split down the middle.
Both the Libertarians and the Greenies will tell you there is not a dimes worth of difference between the major parties. When they don't have their own candidates they either don't vote or split their votes 50 50 between the parties.
To: xsmommy; hobbes1
LOL It is funny.
To: VaBthang4
it will ALWAYS be funny.
18
posted on
11/01/2002 10:48:46 AM PST
by
hobbes1
To: Roscoe
I've met Stanley and I've met Allard.
Only one of them seems to believe my earnings do not belong to me. Only one of them had the gall to lie to me about my own field (engineering/physics). And only one of them is going to spend my confiscated income on windmills even after I explicited spelled out why it was a waste of my money.
If Allard would get serious about reducing taxes,government waste, or protecting the Bill of Rights, I might vote for him. When I met him he was helping a company exclude itself from burdensome regulation in exchange for a fund raiser. I would prefer to see him attack the crippling regulation, but somehow I don't think he will do that. After all, that is the source of these people's power. First you rob and cripple people with regulation and taxes and then you secure political power by allowing certain organizations to exclude themselves from the rules or share in the loot.
This sort of behavior is killing this country.
To: hobbes1; VaBthang4
and it is mandatory that it posted on any libertarian thread, to put everything in proper perspective.
20
posted on
11/01/2002 10:50:58 AM PST
by
xsmommy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson