[tpaine]

'Perhaps it is better to define libertarianism not [ONLY] by the non-aggression principle but by the principle that any chosen action contains the possibility of third-party damages, and the moral actor accepts personal responsibility for them.'

A rational statement indeed.

Are you in danger of finally becoming an adult, roscoe?
5
_________________________________

"Insofar as it rejects standard Libertarian dogma." roscoe

There is no "standard dogma", roscoe, as you well know, but refuse to acknowlege.
Libertarans live in the real world where personal responsiblity or actions have ~always~ been accepted.
Your silly attempt to deny this fact is just another example of your own irrational actions.

[Little Bill]

I used to say that Libertarians are conservitives that like to smoke dope and got their fist pay check. I now say that Libertarians are hippies that got their first pay check and like to smoke dope.

I like most of what the Libertarians have to say and have worked with them on Ballot issues, but they have a certain spinelessness and guttlessness out side of the "ME" issue that reminds me of the '60's.

[Roscoe]

There is no "standard dogma"

The "non-aggression principle" is standard Libertarian dogma.