Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Lose in Minnesota Supreme Court
Fox News Channel | 10/31/02 | Yankee

Posted on 10/31/2002 2:40:19 PM PST by Yankee

Just announced on "The Big Show".

Minnesota court turned down the Rats.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clintonshowmestate; lawstands; ratslose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

1 posted on 10/31/2002 2:40:19 PM PST by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Yankee
bump
2 posted on 10/31/2002 2:40:50 PM PST by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
What did they lose?
3 posted on 10/31/2002 2:41:08 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
Very positive. Voters wanting to vote for Mondale by absentee must initiate process. Colemen's absentee votes will be counted.
4 posted on 10/31/2002 2:41:12 PM PST by theophilusscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
Yes!! Sanity prevails!
5 posted on 10/31/2002 2:41:15 PM PST by TX Bluebonnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
The Rule of Law survives in at least ONE state!
6 posted on 10/31/2002 2:41:16 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tutstar
Praise the Lord! Miracles happen.
7 posted on 10/31/2002 2:41:28 PM PST by Freakazoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
There's terse, and there's too terse. How about an explanation as to what was at stake? I wasn't aware there were any Minnesota proceedings in progress.
8 posted on 10/31/2002 2:42:14 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
I am playing a tiny, tiny violin for them now. Hear it?
9 posted on 10/31/2002 2:42:49 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
This is Great!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/779576/posts
10 posted on 10/31/2002 2:42:56 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
Supreme Court orders new absentee ballots for those who ask
 
Published Nov. 1, 2002
Minnesota's Supreme Court on Thursday ordered local election officials to send out new absentee and supplemental Senate ballots to people who ask to change their Senate vote in the wake of Sen. Paul Wellstone's death.

Acting just hours after hearing arguments in the case, the court's seven justices didn't detail their reasoning. But the order requires election officials to fulfill requests for new ballots and count the most recent one they receive.

Democratic Party lawyer Alan Weinblatt had urged the court to either invalidate all Senate votes on absentee ballots, deliver new ballots to anyone who previously applied for one or make a new one available at a voter's request.

Even with the court's quick ruling, there's no guarantee voters will get a new ballot in time to return it before polls close on Tuesday. There are only five days left to Tuesday's election, in which former Vice President Walter Mondale has replaced Wellstone as the Democrats' candidate against Republican Norm Coleman.

Secretary of State Mary Kiffmeyer said after the hearing that county auditors would be ready to quickly process requests for new ballots. The order, handed down by the court as a whole, requires county auditors to include instructions that state clearly that the second ballot would replace the first one they mailed in. Voters who sent in their ballots and don't want to make a change can do nothing and their vote will count, the order states.

Republicans opposed a blanket re-mailing, but their lawyer told the court the party was willing to accept an order that new ballots be sent to anyone who requests them, which was the Democrats' second choice.

Weinblatt wanted justices to rule that existing absentee ballots should be considered ``spoiled'' if voters who cast them want to change their vote.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of DFL Party Chairman Mike Erlandson and two voters who will be out of the state on Election Day. It alleges that a process outlined by Kiffmeyer, a Republican, and Attorney General Mike Hatch, a Democrat, could disenfranchise people who voted absentee for Wellstone.

Their guidelines had left people with unreturned absentee ballots to either write in Mondale's name or vote in person at their local election office on or before Election Day. People who had already submitted theirs were told to go their election office and request a new ballot.

11 posted on 10/31/2002 2:42:59 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yankee
Well,well, well. Finally a SC that thinks election laws should stand as written! How refreshing.

Nam Vet

12 posted on 10/31/2002 2:43:22 PM PST by Nam Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Dems had petitioned the court to resend absentee ballots, or allow votes already recieved to be tallied for Mondale.

Answer was no and no.

Coleman's votes will count.

Wellstone's are null and void.
13 posted on 10/31/2002 2:44:07 PM PST by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
It had to do with absentee ballots.

The Rats wanted to count all those sent in from cemetaries.

14 posted on 10/31/2002 2:44:27 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
The antecedent FR thread is still in the sidebar.

Yes, praise be that the law is still the law in my state

15 posted on 10/31/2002 2:44:35 PM PST by irgbar-man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
No one is disenfranchised! Ask for a new ballot, or write in Mondale. No one is denied.

The wisdom of Solomon.

16 posted on 10/31/2002 2:44:43 PM PST by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett; RightWhale
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the state does NOT have to print and send out all new absentee ballots with Mondale's name on them now, four days before the election. Voters who want a new ballot will have to ask for one.

It will make it harder for the Dems to rig the election via truckloads of absentee ballots that won't come in until three weeks after the election

17 posted on 10/31/2002 2:45:17 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nam Vet
I'm confused.
People who voted for Wellstone via Absentee?
Their votes STAY? I'm not seeing mention of this.
To me that last article makes it look like New Absentee Ballots are being put out?
18 posted on 10/31/2002 2:45:26 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"The Rule of Law survives in at least ONE state!"

Yes, exactly!

19 posted on 10/31/2002 2:45:46 PM PST by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The Court ruled that the state of MN does NOT have to send new absentee ballots to all the voters who already voted. Instead, they said that the burden lies on those who already voted for Wellstone to come in to their polling place for a supplemental ballot.

Don't know how much difference this will make in the end, but it certainly isn't the news the Dems were hoping for. If only 70% of the Wellstone absentee voters decide to "re-vote", that's still 30% (maybe thousands of votes) that WON'T get revoted.

20 posted on 10/31/2002 2:45:47 PM PST by NYS_Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson