Given that he says "probably", it seems clear that he is expressing an opinion rather than making a pronouncement of scientific fact. Surely he's entitled to an opinion...
I didn't say he was not entitled to an opinion. I rejected it as a "valid" use of the experimental results.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. However, when a supposed scientists injects claims that are not supported by evidence, one must consider such a claim to be deceitful. He is lending his authority and that of his research to something which he has no right to claim.