Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: citizenK
My post to you was intended to help you understand the politics of socialism in a different light. I can see that my efforts, at least where you are concerned, were a waste of time.

C'mon, citizenK. I'm not a dunce. Of course the US has some socialistic policies - though most, honestly, would not consider the US a socialist state. We're arguing about the definition of socialism. You want me to believe that something is socialist or not. Anyone can define socialism any way they want. It's not really relevant. Let's argue about whether certain policies are constitutional, or whether the benefits of certain policies outweigh the detriments thereof.

242 posted on 10/31/2002 9:37:13 AM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]


To: yendu bwam
Let's argue about whether certain policies are constitutional, or whether the benefits of certain policies outweigh the detriments thereof.

Good. I think that until the first question is argued, and the answer found to be in the affirmative, then we don't have any business arguing the second at all.

251 posted on 10/31/2002 9:50:46 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson