[philman_36]

You were the one who was making, IMO, an absurd claim, that she was going to lose votes.
I didn't say that or claim that! I said...
"It's amazing that she came out with this right before an election. You'd think she was trying to blow her chances of winning."

But IMO, you would rather call her names because you do not agree with her that drug abuse is a problem at all.
And I resent your implication! I've called her no names!
You need to retract that!

[Dane]

And I resent your implication! I've called her no names! You need to retract that!

Excuse me, you may have not called her names but the side you sympathize with has.

Okey dokey everything fine now?

I actually agree with Liddy Dole in principle except about the Federal part, but she is a lot less scary to me than your side, which basically states that drug abuse in the US is not a problem.