No, or course not. But the fact is (marijuana aside) that drug use terrifies a great many (obviously not all) parents. I've seen first hand the destruction that drugs bring to kids and to communities. I've seen the death on the roads caused by kids using drugs. I KNOW it's a serious danger to my kids - and I KNOW there are lots of evil people (right in my town and in my kids' schools) who would love for my kids to get hooked on powerful and dangerous drugs. Dole (though wrong consitutionally) is talking to the many, many parents terrified by what drugs can do to their kids.
Yes, she is. She's using an emotional issue, and emotional rhetoric to convince people that the federal government needs to get involved in something that constitutionally, it has no business or authority doing. How do you see that from a politically conservative standpoint, and what kind of precedent does it set? How does it fit the agenda of getting the federal government under control?