Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36
Sheesh you all get in a big snit if someone is anti-drug. Look Liddy Dole put out to the electorate that she is anti-drug. The drug culture brought to us by the leftist 60's counterculture and promulgated by the media has been devastating to the US and a majority of the electorate seeing the devastation is not pro-drug.

She is just showing that she is anti-drug and will not kowtow to the drug lobby(Soros & Co.)

Like I said before this thread was posted for one reason only, to gin up the pro-drug Libertarians.

102 posted on 10/31/2002 7:10:46 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
No she is showing that she believes, even more now than before, that the average subject can not take care of themselves in their own car.
108 posted on 10/31/2002 7:17:23 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
She is just showing that she is anti-drug and will not kowtow to the drug lobby(Soros & Co.)
Yeah...right...this is 1998/1999
$17.1 Billion 1998 National Drug Control Strategy Claims Youth as Top Priority
The 1998 National Drug Control Strategy provides for $17.1 billion in federal spending in FY 1999 for anti-drug programs, an increase of $1.1 billion (6.8%) over the FY 1998 enacted level.
How about the current plans?
Fact Sheet on President Bush's National Drug Control Strategy FY-2003
Overall, the President's 2003 Budget includes $19.2 billion for drug control.
An increase of $2.1 billion in 3 years? Who's got the big bucks?

Is she perhaps kowtowing to the anti-drug lobby called the federal government?

119 posted on 10/31/2002 7:27:29 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson