Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marijuana Arrests For Year 2001 Second Highest Ever
email

Posted on 10/29/2002 9:07:50 AM PST by Texaggie79

Marijuana Arrests For Year 2001 Second Highest Ever Despite Feds' War On Terror, FBI Report Reveals

Washington, DC: Police arrested an estimated 723,627 persons for marijuana violations in 2001, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's annual Uniform Crime Report, released today. The total is the second highest ever recorded by the FBI, and comprises nearly half of all drug arrests in the United States.

"These numbers belie the myth that police do not target and arrest minor marijuana offenders," said Keith Stroup, Executive Director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML). "In fact, the war on drugs is largely a war on pot smokers. This effort is a tremendous waste of criminal justice resources that should be dedicated toward combating serious and violent crime, including the war on terrorism."

Of those charged with marijuana violations, 88.6 percent - some 641,108 Americans - were charged with possession only. The remaining 82,518 individuals were charged with "sale/manufacture," a category that includes all cultivation offenses - even those where the marijuana was being grown for personal or medical use.

The total number of marijuana arrests far exceeds the total number of arrests for all violent crimes combined, including murder, manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery and aggravated assault.

Since 1992, approximately six million Americans have been arrested on marijuana charges, a greater number than the entire populations of Alaska, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming combined. Annual marijuana arrests have nearly doubled in that time.

"It's time we stopped arresting adults who use marijuana responsibly," says Stroup.

YEAR MARIJUANA ARRESTS

2001 723,627
2000 734,498
1999 704,812
1998 682,885
1997 695,200
1996 641,642
1995 588,963
1994 499,122
1993 380,689
1992 342,314

For more information, please contact Keith Stroup or Paul Armentano of NORML at (202) 483-5500. NORML "Talking Points" on marijuana arrest and incarceration rates are available online at: http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3381.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: aggiedopersdamn; blackhelicopters; crybabyfreetally; darklorddumblord; dopersarelosers; doperwhiners; freetallyadoper; hippiedoperssuck; jedigirlsympathizer; keywordabusefest; liberdopianbilge; obeyorpay; obeythelaw; paxmacisanut; potheadidiots; saynopetodope; saynottopot; slanderingstatists; smokedopegotojail; tinfoilmaterial; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-364 next last

1 posted on 10/29/2002 9:07:50 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Dear Msrs. Stroup and Armentano:

Stop breaking the law. You will be assured of remaining free.

N.B.: Help is available for you to kick your addiction to pot. Please get some.

2 posted on 10/29/2002 9:11:32 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
BTTT
3 posted on 10/29/2002 9:13:51 AM PST by AUgrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
If Chinese would not practice Chi-Gong, they wouldn't be killed. It's their own damn fault. If Cubans would keep their mouths shut and not talk critically about Castro, they wouldnt have to worry about going to jail. It's against the law in those countries, they just need to stop breaking the law.

Glad you simplified it for us Illbay
4 posted on 10/29/2002 9:14:08 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Heck, doesn't look like things really got crankin' until Clinton took over. Silver lining for some, I guess.
5 posted on 10/29/2002 9:15:49 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
I realize that, for many, pot IS a religion. But for the vast majority of us, trying to equate the right to get stoned--and likely, to harm others by one's actions, not to mention becoming the burden on society that stoners inevitably do--with the First Amendment is REALLY stretching things beyond the credible breaking point.
6 posted on 10/29/2002 9:19:14 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Stop breaking the law. You will be assured of remaining free.

"If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear."

-Lavrenti Beria, Moscow, 1935

7 posted on 10/29/2002 9:20:59 AM PST by Oberon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
Of those charged with marijuana violations, 88.6 percent - some 641,108 Americans - were charged with possession only. The remaining 82,518 individuals were charged with "sale/manufacture," a category that includes all cultivation offenses - even those where the marijuana was being grown for personal or medical use.

But they aren't arresting users I here. This can not be right. /sarcasm

The total number of marijuana arrests far exceeds the total number of arrests for all violent crimes combined, including murder, manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery and aggravated assault.

Let me insert the obligatory "I feel much safer".

8 posted on 10/29/2002 9:21:29 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
How many of the 70,000,000+ people who admit to smoking pot do you think we would have to arrest to win the drug war?
9 posted on 10/29/2002 9:22:25 AM PST by Lysander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Stop breaking the law. You will be assured of remaining free.

Why not make alcohol illegal?

10 posted on 10/29/2002 9:22:41 AM PST by BrooklynGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lysander
Don't even bother. He only comes on threads to start flame wars.
11 posted on 10/29/2002 9:23:56 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
But for the vast majority of us, trying to equate the right to get stoned

Vast majority? Hah! What are YOU smoking?

--and likely, to harm others by one's actions,

For example? I bet more people cause harm by their alcohol influenced actions then by pot. not to mention becoming the burden on society that stoners inevitably do--with the First Amendment is REALLY stretching things beyond the credible breaking point.

What places a burden on us is the WOD.

12 posted on 10/29/2002 9:24:43 AM PST by BrooklynGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Are you suggesting this person does not have the right to advocate for change?
13 posted on 10/29/2002 9:25:42 AM PST by AUgrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BrooklynGOP
I'm all for it.
14 posted on 10/29/2002 9:26:42 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
harm others by one's actions
What harm to others did you have in mind?
15 posted on 10/29/2002 9:26:48 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
and likely, to harm others by one's actions

Please tell me how you figure that. I'm 100% with you on HARD drugs. Crack, meth, ect. Ya, they are a THREAT. But show me ONE threat to you or anyone that someone that smokes pot poses. Apparently, the propaganda has worked on you, because you seem to think that everyone that smokes pot is a pothead. Is everyone that drinks an alcoholic? Most people that smoke pot smoke it less than social drinkers drink.

16 posted on 10/29/2002 9:27:10 AM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AUgrad
Of course he has that right. Just so long as he does so without abetting the sale and use of an illegal narcotic.
17 posted on 10/29/2002 9:28:10 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
And he's not very good at it either.
18 posted on 10/29/2002 9:29:23 AM PST by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I'm all for it.

At least you're consistent in your wish to Taliban-ize America.

19 posted on 10/29/2002 9:29:54 AM PST by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Some people are alcohol addicts. They rob or kill to support their addiction. Some addicts drink and drive and cause accidents and kill other people.

Maybe alcohol should be outlawed.

Some people are sex addicts and rape or kill in order to pursue their sex craze.

Sounds like sex should be outlawed. We have technology to reproduce the human race now without sex, so we can outlaw it.

How about this: You worry about what you put in your body and let other people worry about what they put in their bodies, as long as they are not infringing upon the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of other Americans. Someone smoking pot on his/her property is not infringing upon my rights, however, someone telling me what I should or should not put in my body IS infringing upon my rights to do with my body as I see fit.
20 posted on 10/29/2002 9:30:48 AM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-364 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson