To: null and void
My dad, long-time civil engineer consultant in Texas, said the smoke, fire, and flame intensity in the WTC was "way, way too much to be due to the airplane fuel alone - even when combined with the papers and office material in the area.
He's been deeply suspicious of "flamables" packed intot heose floors ahead of time ... such as in "unboxed" containers or something else.
Sprinkler systems "work" could be an excuse for more sabatogue/mayhem.
Such as filling the sprinlker system with a combustable? Or simply "securing" the system in that area so was no effect?
To: Robert A. Cook, PE; Betty Jo; aristeides; antivenom
This article is a red herring, misdirection piece IMHO.
I think the lily whites here are getting the pile on treatment.
I expect in a day or two they will confess to everything, however. Every man can be broken by the government experts, but these two are apparently tough cookies thus far.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson