Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void
My dad, long-time civil engineer consultant in Texas, said the smoke, fire, and flame intensity in the WTC was "way, way too much to be due to the airplane fuel alone - even when combined with the papers and office material in the area.

He's been deeply suspicious of "flamables" packed intot heose floors ahead of time ... such as in "unboxed" containers or something else.

Sprinkler systems "work" could be an excuse for more sabatogue/mayhem.

Such as filling the sprinlker system with a combustable? Or simply "securing" the system in that area so was no effect?
137 posted on 10/28/2002 4:34:53 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE; Betty Jo; aristeides; antivenom
This article is a red herring, misdirection piece IMHO.

I think the lily whites here are getting the pile on treatment.

I expect in a day or two they will confess to everything, however. Every man can be broken by the government experts, but these two are apparently tough cookies thus far.
139 posted on 10/28/2002 5:11:23 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson