Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vannrox
This was flawed from the first sentence:

Earlier this summer, as the economy slowed and the winds of scandal swept through Washington and Wall Street, it looked likely that the Democrats would win big in November. But the two month long debate over war with Iraq, initiated and orchestrated by the Bush administration, may have blunted this outcome.

This was the Democrats' dream, but Iraq wasn't the primary factor. None of the Democrat trial balloons gained traction (to badly mix metaphors). The voters just didn't care about any of the issues they raised, and when they tried to stir up scandal, more of it stuck to them than to the Republicans.

The Democrats will be surprised at how badly they do on November 5th.

8 posted on 10/27/2002 8:41:42 AM PST by AZLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AZLiberty
If the Democrats are the party of the future, why do they have candidates like Frank Lautenberg and Fritz Mondale? Why are candidates like Kathleen Kennedy Townsend running on glories now 40 years old? Why do they need to rely on inner city blacks mired in poverty for their base vote?

Enquiring minds want to know.

33 posted on 10/27/2002 9:55:19 AM PST by The Iron Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson