Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY WE MUST VOTE REPUBLICAN
Fiedior Report On the News #293 ^ | 10-27-02 | Doug Fiedor

Posted on 10/26/2002 10:12:21 AM PDT by forest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201 next last
To: Teacher317
The corpse makes a better candidate than any living person in her eyes. Simply amazing.

Hmmm.... Well I actually agree with Barbara Streisand in this case. A dead Democrat is often better than a live Republican. Think of the kind of country this would be if all the Democrats were dead.

If dead Democrats can vote, it is only proper that you not disenfranchise them and put one of their own on the ballot.

81 posted on 10/26/2002 12:28:46 PM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Lowelljr
No need to blame libertarians because the republicans cannot get enough votes to pursue their agenda of rights infringements.
82 posted on 10/26/2002 12:28:56 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
The only difference is who pays for the clean up after the social orgy.

OK...at least I understand you now...tis more conservative to have society to pay for the clean up than to have the individual pay for it...have government take responsibility and be accountable instead of individuals.

I'm sorry sir...but thats what we call socialism...the thing we're all trying to prevent.

83 posted on 10/26/2002 12:29:58 PM PDT by BureaucratusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
I'd be embarrassed too if I had called Bush a conservative.

Demi you have shown that very little embarrases you. You vote for a party that uphold everything that embarrases the rest of us. Gay Rights/drugs/anti-borders/prostitution/anti-religious morality/anarchy. In one state a LP canidate for governor has 17 charges against him including discharging a firearm while intoxicated. That is scarry, but I am sure you are not embarrassed.

84 posted on 10/26/2002 12:30:05 PM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: forest
btt
85 posted on 10/26/2002 12:32:02 PM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lowelljr
You vote for a party that uphold everything that embarrases the rest of us.

If you are embarrassed by the constitution, then I am proud to be against you and your ilk.

86 posted on 10/26/2002 12:32:43 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
If you are embarrassed by the constitution, then I am proud to be against you and your ilk.

Your interpertation of the constitution is anarchy, ilk away.

87 posted on 10/26/2002 12:34:43 PM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Lowelljr
��5{��������vote for "gun control radical" by electing Demos.

No, read what I wrote. I wouldn't vote for a Democrat that was for gun control. They may be elected, but I didn't elect them.

Using your reasoning, I could correctly assert that everyone who voted Republican in the 90's voted for Clinton because they didn't vote for Perot. After all, Perot could have won if the Republicans had backed him instead of the Republican candidate. I guess Republicans are just a bunch of Clinton-lovers, since by not voting for Perot they were voting for Clinton.

88 posted on 10/26/2002 12:35:10 PM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: rightwing.wacko
Finally an honest man!

The real reason for your vote is $$$. Clearly, whether you vote socialist or socialist-lite, you'll still get the same policies and programs, only the talking smiley-faces are slightly different. Face it, when they get to Valhalla on the Potomac, they'll all drink the same Dom Perignon, and party with the same adolescents.

Didn't we learn our lesson in '94?
89 posted on 10/26/2002 12:36:03 PM PDT by karlamayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
Doh! My browser munged it. That should be You then vote for "gun control radical" by electing Demos.
90 posted on 10/26/2002 12:37:32 PM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Lowelljr
Your interpertation of the constitution is anarchy, ilk away.

Of course. Any interpretation that prevents republicans from stealing away our rights is "anarchy." LOL.

91 posted on 10/26/2002 12:39:34 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus
OK...at least I understand you now...tis more conservative to have society to pay for the clean up than to have the individual pay for it...have government take responsibility and be accountable instead of individuals.

No you don't.
I'm saying Planned Parenthood endorses teen sex. Get rid of Planned Parenthood and make abstinance the norm,and the problem would be basically solved.
Homosexuality spreads AIDs. Get rid of homosexuals by putting them back in the nuthouses where they belong, and maybe we could rid the country of this plague. Problem solved.
Give the parents school choice to avoid indoctrination and allow them to get a proper education . That way they're smart enough to get a job. Welfare would be a thing of the past. Problem solved.
Libertarianism adds to the moral decline in America. Without a sence of moral right and wrong, the Constitution is dead. It will most certainly depend on the meaning of the word "is." After all, lieing is good because there is no concept of right and wrong in America today.
Your party endorses the tearing of the moral fabric that supports the constitution, yet you use that Constitution to push it's death agenda as if you were patriots. No, in my opinion you're more anti-American than pro-American. If you were pro-American, you'd see the value of this fabric. Therefore, your agenda no better than the Democrat agenda you support.
Now do you understand why, in clear conscience, I could never vote Libertatian? Why add to the demise of the American culture that built this nation?
To put it simply,why make a mess in the first place? That way, no one is forced to clean up the sludge left behind.

92 posted on 10/26/2002 12:42:11 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
lol.....true
93 posted on 10/26/2002 12:43:28 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
What if I'd prefer my kids not be exposed to Liberal Libertarian plagues and stuff? Prostitutes, Aids, drugs,.... They'll have to live in the sludge. Why would I want that? If I wanted that, I'd vote Democrat.


Let me try to understand this now . . . are you saying that you reject the concept of Liberty the Founding Fathers intended to guarantee to all of us so that big government might have the power to intimidate and punish children for those things you class as immoral and/or improper?

Ouch!

Because, in truth, if that is what you want, then you Should be for legalizing and government regulation of these things. Proof is in the pudding -- on the streets of Anytown, USA.

Ask any kid where to by drugs. They can all get illegal drugs a lot faster then you probably can. Yet, they have problems buying alcoholic beverages. They need an adult to get beer for them.

Children need life-training in right and wrong from their parents, not through intimidation via the guns of government. Part of living free is getting to make your own mistakes. It is under the guise of socialized medicine, etc., that government demands an ever-expanding vote in our personal activities.

Because of all the above -- and much more -- I shall always vote for Liberty and reject government intrusion into any quarter not specifically granted government by the Constitution.

94 posted on 10/26/2002 12:44:10 PM PDT by Doug Fiedor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
Yep Parot was a good example on a larger scale of what the LP party can dictate. 4 years of Clinton then and then the incumbant win the second 4 years. Parot has done very little for the so called cause since then.
95 posted on 10/26/2002 12:44:48 PM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
Doh! My browser munged it. That should be You then vote for "gun control radical" by electing Demos.

I just figured you had a long string of profanity for me at the start of that quote and were kindly blonking it out for me. LOL...

96 posted on 10/26/2002 12:47:56 PM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Lowelljr
Gay Rights/drugs/anti-borders/prostitution/anti-religious morality/anarchy.

A (LP) would leave Gay Rights up to the states...no federal lobby or indoctrination...no federal regulations to tell you to show the video "Why Heather has two mommies" in a forth grade home economics class (no public school controlled by the NEA either BTW), no federal regulations to force health insurance companies to view Bruce and his significant others as a "married" couple and cover both of their health insurance.

I'm anti-open borders too...I can't comment here.

What is anti-religous morality for one is different for another...some people think its OK to drink, some don't; some don't believe in using electricity (Amish), some do; some people think prostitution is perfectly fine, some don't; (and if they want a prostitute, legally or illegally there going to get one anyway, if you think its wrong, be faithful to your wife and teach your kids to do this as well...its your right)

The anarchy comment is just a usual term to bash libertarians...I don't do flame wars.

97 posted on 10/26/2002 12:49:07 PM PDT by BureaucratusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
By the same token, I occasionally will vote for a Democrat who for some reason is out of line with the rest of the party and actually supports the issues I hold dear to my heart.

Even if your vote for that "out of line" Democrat gives the majority of the House and/or Senate to all the rest of the Democrats? The same hard core Socialist/Progressive/Liberal extremists who will chair ALL the committees, subcommittees, confirmations, budget/taxing/spendig processes, congressional agenda, etc, etc, etc, etc,.....? Is it your vote that is responsible for the Democrat control of the Senate today?

98 posted on 10/26/2002 12:50:07 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Doug Fiedor
Let me try to understand this now . . . are you saying that you reject the concept of Liberty the Founding Fathers intended to guarantee to all of us so that big government might have the power to intimidate and punish children for those things you class as immoral and/or improper?

No. I'm saying right now government should work to change the hearts and minds of the American people and get them thinking moral again. It was the Democrat and Libertarian "love fest" that destroyed the moral fabric in the first place with their propaganda. Now, someone has to fix it before it's too late. It may already be too late, but we could try.
Now, You'll have to find another to use as your medium to push your agenda. Your crap won't work on me. Find another. You're wasting your time.

99 posted on 10/26/2002 12:54:18 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
Is it your vote that is responsible for the Democrat control of the Senate today?

Not my vote. I've never voted for a Democrat Senator.

100 posted on 10/26/2002 12:56:36 PM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson