It is not the oil economy in and of itself that supports Islam. We could be energy independent in this nation with our own reserves, nuclear power and alternatives ... and still be a mostly petroleum based economy. It is the dependancy on their oil that is the problem.
I believe we should remove our dependancy on Arab oil. We do that by exploiting our own substantial reserves currently locked away by useful idiot environazis and by developing the alternative sources like we should (nuclear, wind, hydro, etc.) ... and by taking the reseves of any of those nations over there who attack us or abett and harbor those who do. When we own them, we are not dependent on Arab oil any more. Make the first example Iraq.
You earlier reference regarding Waco and who was governor at the time was clear in its context, particularly when you added Ruby Ridge. Your implication that is was the Bush's in both cases was clear. You were wrong on Waco, you would be much more credable if you simply admitted your error instead of trying to cover it up yourself IMHO.
I agree that neither side of the aisle has done what it should have done in either case to get to the bottom of either, or on any number of other issues. That is a problem that has developed over decades, but is one that I believe we are making progress on and will continue to do so.
Yes, but the rest of the world can't. The developing world would continue to be dependant upon mohammedan oil and, therefore, Western financial institutions would be intimately invested in allah's oil. And where Western financial institutions go, Western taxpayers cannot be far behind to bail them out.
By the way, I am no fan of the current "green" movement, which, I believe is funded by the oil oligarchy. Why do I think that? Because the SOLE effect of green activism in the last 30 years has been the total reinfocement of the STATUS QUO in energy production and economic consciousness.
There's oil money behind these global ecology agreements like Kyoto. The purpose of these highly bureaucratic agreements is to preserve the status quo--with a heavier tax burden on the so-called "rich" nations-- while bringing the developing world into the web.
All of these rich, white, "green" students are the perfect front for the status quo. Not only are they ignorant, they are arrogant---the perfect form of acceptable "white supremicism". We only want to help our poor little black and brown brothers. Help them do what? Why, to become as dependant upon oil as we are, of course.
You watch. In a very few years the WTO and the World Bank will start inviting these useful dopes to their confabs in Davos to "adivise" the old grey beards on how best to get everyone equalized in the world. Meaning equally submissive to the oil oligarchy.
What is the color of mohammedanism? Green, of course.....