Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaGman
Seems to me if creationism was real science...

The argument here is not between religion and science. The argument here is between science and the pseudo-science of evolution. The argument here is about what science has shown to be true and what the pseudo-science of evolution claims to be true. The article amply shows that evolution is pseudo-science and that its claims are totally contradicted by the facts.

72 posted on 10/26/2002 8:11:37 AM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: All
Dana Blankenhorn placemarker.
73 posted on 10/26/2002 8:34:16 AM PDT by Condorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: gore3000
And your PhD is in what science and from where? And you're a published scientist in which reputable and respected scientific publication that you can argue so strongly to the wind that creationism is science?

This is hopeless when people are convinced creationism is science. The world began 6000 years ago. Good God! No wonder kids are ignorant when they get out of school when people want to teach them this creationist crap.

81 posted on 10/26/2002 1:27:28 PM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson