To: PatrickHenry
A report on their investigations will appear online in the August issue of Naturwissenschaften ... Old story. I was in threads on FR and jennyp's site at the time.
Apparent conflict. More data needed. Not much else to say.
To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop; AnnaZ
To: Dimensio
As I see it, evolution is an ideological doctrine. If it were only a "scientific theory", it would have died a natural death 50 - 70 years ago; the evidence against it is too overwhelming and has been all along. The people defending it are doing so because they do not like the alternatives to an atheistic basis for science and do not like the logical implications of abandoning their atheistic paradigm and, in conducting themselves that way, they have achieved a degree of immunity to what most people call logic.
488 posted on 7/29/02 5:18 AM Pacific by medved
Great quote. Thanks for posting it.
294 posted on 10/18/02 11:59 AM Pacific by AnnaZ
To: VadeRetro
Apparent conflict. More data needed. Not much else to say.To the ideologues of evolution it is always a matter of 'more data needed'. They have been saying that since Darwin. Actually the Evidence Disproving Evolution is already overwhelming and irrefutable.
40 posted on
10/25/2002 5:25:27 AM PDT by
gore3000
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson