Ask anyone who pays by the square foot, triple net lease, and %age.
Who gets to decide what speech is legitimate? I'm in favor of the mall being able to keep out undesirables, but I can understand that public money was taken. Perhaps a reasonable compromise (like letting protesters and such hand things out at the entrances) can be fashioned.
I wonder how the judges would feel if people were engaging in their free speech rights in their taxpayer-supplied courtrooms!