Skip to comments.
Cockfighting measure on ballot
AP/The Seattle Times ^
| 10/19/02
| Ron Jenkins
Posted on 10/19/2002 12:09:22 PM PDT by ppaul
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Imagine the millions of dollars spent over this issue!
What a waste.
Any cockfightin' FReepers out there?
1
posted on
10/19/2002 12:09:22 PM PDT
by
ppaul
To: ppaul
Any cockfightin' FReepers out there?
No, but I had a fascinating tutorial about 30 years ago...drove a girlfriend from L.A. to Salisaw, Oklahoma (hard by Ft. Smith, Arkansas) to her parents' place. Her dad raised fighting cocks and had done so all his life.
Pretty brutal, but the amount of breeding involved could make some cocks extremely valuable.
At that stage, he was retired but kept breeding and manufacturing spurs....in his younger years he'd drive all day and night to Arizona and even Kalifornia to "participate". I seem to recall him telling me that a fight could last as little as three or four seconds - if you had a good bird.
To: ppaul
To: ppaul
who cares what someone else wants to do with their animals. animals are property.
4
posted on
10/19/2002 12:28:50 PM PDT
by
Nayt2
To: martin_fierro
That's the best way to settle a cockfight: measure.
5
posted on
10/19/2002 12:33:24 PM PDT
by
dogbowl
To: ppaul
I used to go to a lot of cockfights in the Red River Bottom north of Wichita County, Texas. Yes, they were brutal and there was a lot of gambling and drinking going on. The birds were treated very well until the fight. If they won they were treated very well. I never gave much thought to whether or not the fights were humane or not, they were just cock fights between food animals. The birds suffered less in a cock fight than they did at the local slaughterhouse where they had their throats slit and while bleeding and alive were dipped into scalding hot water. They were less brutal than the bullfights at Ciudad Acuna at the Macarena. What did bother me was the guy from the local fried chicken house collecting the losers.
To: martin_fierro
HA! Yea... sword-fighting.
7
posted on
10/19/2002 12:42:48 PM PDT
by
johnny7
To: vetvetdoug
What did bother me was the guy from the local fried chicken house collecting the losers. That would bother me too. Roosters (especially fighting roosters) are never used in decent fried chicken; they're too stringy and tough. Stay well away from that guy's business unless you truly enjoy "rubber chicken."
8
posted on
10/19/2002 12:46:57 PM PDT
by
strela
To: ppaul
Opponents say the sport... Sport?? Cockfighting is a sport? What? A couple of tiny fryers duking it out? That's a sport?
Now, dog fighting, that's a sport!
9
posted on
10/19/2002 2:03:03 PM PDT
by
PaulJ
To: ppaul
I live if Oklahoma and I intend to for the ban.
10
posted on
10/19/2002 2:03:13 PM PDT
by
amigatec
To: amigatec
k
11
posted on
10/19/2002 2:12:29 PM PDT
by
xrp
To: amigatec
I live if Oklahoma and I intend to for the ban. I should have said "I live in Oklahoma and I intend to vote for the ban." Fat Fingers on the keyboard.
12
posted on
10/19/2002 2:14:47 PM PDT
by
amigatec
To: amigatec
I live in Oklahoma and I intend to vote for the banWhy?
Just seems like more "do-gooder" government meddling.
13
posted on
10/19/2002 2:45:50 PM PDT
by
ppaul
To: ppaul
Cockfighting measure on ballotAs George Carlin would say: "Cock fighting? What?"
14
posted on
10/19/2002 2:50:14 PM PDT
by
TankerKC
To: ppaul
"allow the bloody spectacle"
What? Okies aren't happy with the spectacle of the teams slaughtered by the Sooners?
To: PaulJ
Gladitorial combat is even better. Basically, if people want to fight animals that is their business.
To: ppaul
Not a fighter and don't attend 'em, but I'm voting against the ban.
To: ppaul
When I first read the headline, I thought that Slick and The Swimmer were going to have a duel.
18
posted on
10/19/2002 3:42:01 PM PDT
by
Cobra64
To: tal hajus
Not a fighter and don't attend 'em, but I'm voting against the ban.Good for you! We had this situation in Arizona, and the ban passed. It was pitiful. The OldDominantLiberalMedia out in force, lying their A** off.
The small minority of dedicated cockfighting enthusiasts, begging for help to defeat the measure, virtually closed out of any debate, because they were right and their was no logical reason for the ban.
Ownership of the birds made a felony, so that all would have to be killed, if the afficionados followed the law.
Passage, with the resultant creation of thousands of new felons, and the state with another victimless crime that it can use to persecute those it chooses to.
To: marktwain
Hey Butthead: he said "cockfighting".
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson