Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/19/2002 5:25:28 AM PDT by krodriguesdc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: krodriguesdc
Stockholders will have a fit.
2 posted on 10/19/2002 5:27:46 AM PDT by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: krodriguesdc
This is just sour grapes from the regulatory world. This article is nothing new.

Any practitioner will tell you that Neurontin is a highly effective drug for many off-label purposes. However, since the drug is near patent expiration and the costs of trials are extremely high, it is assuredly unprofitable to try to prove its efficacy in traditional manners.

Many drugs have been marketed off label with no complaints. I think what the attorneys general would really like is some money to line their products, not drug reform.

3 posted on 10/19/2002 6:04:48 AM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: krodriguesdc
I've got no problem with Neurontin being used for other purposes. I do have a problem if indeed doctors are receiving "paid kickbacks" for prescribing certain drugs.
5 posted on 10/19/2002 6:26:29 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson