Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Payload bay doors are closed
Space.com ^ | 18 Oct 2002 | Jim Banke

Posted on 10/18/2002 6:46:24 AM PDT by Lokibob

 
 
 
Payload bay doors are closed
Friday, Oct. 18, 2002 at 8:15 a.m. EDT

Landing is on schedule for this morning.

Shuttle Atlantis' payload bay doors were closed a few minutes ago and the crew is now reconfiguring the orbiter computer software to run the landing-related program.

The weather here is absolutely perfect, with sunny skies, light winds and cool temperatures that will make it a lot nicer to work out on the shuttle runway once Atlantis has touched down and rolled to a stop.

The shuttle is now scheduled to fire its twin braking rockets at 10:36 a.m. EDT and land at 11:44 a.m. EDT.

The landing will be on Runway 33, which means the shuttle will fly overhead, make a sweeping right-hand turn to line up with the concrete strip and fly an approach from the south to the north.

Local Space Coast residents will have an excellent chance to see Atlantis land, with the parking lot of the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex being a particulary good spot to see the final approach.

Stay tuned to this page for confirmation of the de-orbit burn at 10:36 a.m. EDT.

-- Jim Banke, Senior Producer, Cape Canaveral Bureau


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: landing; nasa; shuttle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Shuttle is southeast of New Zealand, and pitching nose upward, ready for entry interface. About to cross the terminator into daylight...
21 posted on 10/18/2002 8:02:54 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Sorry, I pulled up the ground track for orbit 171. Deorbit after 170 looks like this.

Crap!


22 posted on 10/18/2002 8:03:07 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
No one learned how to make a computer, connect to the Internet, or get to FreeRepublic from the Bible. It's not nearly "all (you) needed to know."

All I needed to know about that. Go read it again, and note what "that" is. How to make a computer, etc., is nothing to do with "greater understanding of the world (and universe) we live in."

Sheesh.

23 posted on 10/18/2002 8:03:59 AM PDT by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Amazing how lessons learned during the 16th century still don't apply in the 21st century.


http://www.catholic.net/rcc/Periodicals/Issues/Galileo.html

The Galileo Affair
By George Sim Johnston Galileo's condemnation by Church authorities for promoting the heliocentric model of the solar system against a literal reading of certain passages of scripture did not loom large in the minds of his contemporaries. But in modern times, it has become a kind of myth, which is used to show that science and Church dogma are antagonistic.
24 posted on 10/18/2002 8:09:26 AM PDT by Lokibob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Interesting editing job since that's not what Chemist_Geek posted

I quoted exactly what he posted. You would do well to click the "To n" link at the bottom of my post, before you start hurling such accusations.

Bottom line: liberals and "conservatives" alike can and do rationalize whatever their pet projects might be.

25 posted on 10/18/2002 8:09:38 AM PDT by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
If one understands the Universe within which we live, then and only then can we build these computers and networks and so forth. Without an understanding of electromagnetism, we could not build computers let alone electric lights. What does the Bible have to say about electromagnetism?

One only gains understanding through exploration, study and experiment. Science, in other words.

Shuttle altitude 535,000 feet, speed Mach 25.

26 posted on 10/18/2002 8:09:51 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Kinda like when Portugal, Spain, England, and Italy sponsored expeditions to the New World. What a waste of their tax dollars, but then again, I've always wondered why stop lights weren't more democratic.
27 posted on 10/18/2002 8:10:35 AM PDT by MrNeutron1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Sorry, I see after looking back that you were replying to post 8 rather that 11 (which appeared directly before). The larger point stands that the Constitution allows for funding of scientific research.
28 posted on 10/18/2002 8:12:43 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
The word "given", I guess should be "encouraged". The space program has ENCOURAGED private industry to GIVE us etc.....

I know we will not change your mind, but private industry is in the finest traditions of conservatism.
29 posted on 10/18/2002 8:13:07 AM PDT by Lokibob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Entry interphase, gravity is now being felt aboard the shuttle.
30 posted on 10/18/2002 8:13:31 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Wx update: Winds from 040 degrees (northeast) at 10 MPH, gusting to 20 MPH. Temperature 75 °F. Pressure 30.15 in.Hg. Visibility 10 miles. Scattered clouds at 4,000 feet.

Shuttle altitude 58 miles. 28 minutes to touchdown.

31 posted on 10/18/2002 8:16:38 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
OK - some questions for somebody who seems to understand more of this space op lingo than I do.

1. For spacecraft in geosynchronous orbit, are operations under the rules of microgravity, or is everything being pulled down at a high fraction of surface gravity?

2. Why haven't we ween many unfiltered photographs taken of the stars during the "night" parts of an orbit? I'd think the panoramic shots would be incredible.

32 posted on 10/18/2002 8:19:09 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek; The_Victor; All
Glad you guys are posting this...I don't have TV today and didn't know it was coming down today.

I am another one of those foolish conservatives who is interested in the space program.

33 posted on 10/18/2002 8:19:35 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All
Bottom line: liberals and "conservatives" alike can and do rationalize whatever their pet projects might be.

Anything the government boondoggles produced for private industry could just as well have been produced by private industry (certainly for less money and most likely faster). But, only a fool would risk his own neck, if he can convince or rely on The People to risk The Peoples' money on his behalf. (If you really think the exploration of the New World couldn't have happened without government subsidies, you're almost a socialist yourself!)

Rationalize all you want. You're no better than the bleeding-heart liberals on this point. With regard to its limitations on Congressional spending, the Constitution isn't worth diddly. Anything goes.

When it comes to government spending, the difference between liberals and some of you self-anointed conservatives is just the kind (if not the price) of your toys.

End of story.

34 posted on 10/18/2002 8:25:35 AM PDT by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I am another one of those foolish conservatives who is interested in the space program

You have to say it correctly. Since you approve of the space program that makes you a "conservative". (emphasis on quotes)

35 posted on 10/18/2002 8:27:10 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
1. For spacecraft in geosynchronous orbit, are operations under the rules of microgravity, or is everything being pulled down at a high fraction of surface gravity?

At geosynchronous orbit, gravity isn't felt any more than in any other orbit. The craft is falling towards the earth, but it's also moving along relative to the surface of the earth, so while it's falling it never actually quite hits the Earth.

2. Why haven't we ween many unfiltered photographs taken of the stars during the "night" parts of an orbit? I'd think the panoramic shots would be incredible.

I dunno. Maybe it has to do with the contrast. Stars would be mere pinpricks of light, against a pitch blackness..

Everything going well, Atlantis rolling and pitching to bleed off speed. Altitude 39 miles, speed 13,000 MPH - Mach 18.5, range to airfield 1,400 miles. Radio is blocked, I suppose, due to the frictional ionization of the air. Freepers in the Yucatan peninsula should look to the southwest now; maybe a meteor-like streak could be seen...

36 posted on 10/18/2002 8:27:34 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Atlantis now passing between Mexico and Cuba. Look up, Fidel, and weep!
37 posted on 10/18/2002 8:30:36 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

33 miles altitude, 575 miles to airfield. Speed 8000 MPH. Florida freepers look to the southwest, and hang on for the sonic booms...
38 posted on 10/18/2002 8:32:06 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
I still have to chuckle at how some "conservatives" absolutely love the space program. To the extent that it exceeds what is necessary for national defense, it's just another example of unconstitutional, pork-barrel boondoggling...

The whole reason space programs are so plodding and overpriced is that governments run them. NASA has given us post offices in the sky. If the computer industry had been run like the space program, I would still be punchcarding this on my old IBM 7094.

39 posted on 10/18/2002 8:34:48 AM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Altitude 25 miles, Mach 6.5, landfall now into Florida.
40 posted on 10/18/2002 8:34:51 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson