Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

News From The Brave New World ( My Title)
independent.co.uk ^ | October 17, 2002 | Arifa Akbar

Posted on 10/17/2002 8:25:58 PM PDT by ladysusan

'Six British couples chose babies' sex' By Arifa Akbar 17 October 2002 At least six British couples are believed to have chosen the gender of their babies for social reasons such as 'family balancing', a conference revealed yesterday.

The couples had travelled to the United States to undergo MicroSort, a technique originally developed for cattle that enables sperm to be screened in order to choose a desired gender. The oldest baby born through the technique is believed to be aged one.

According to details presented to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in Seattle, the screening, which has led to the birth of 300 babies, has a 91 per cent success rate for producing girls and 74 per cent for boys. The process is is not illegal in Britain, but is not offered by any clinic in Britain or Europe. It costs around £4,000 and was initially developed by the US Department of Agriculture.

Many of the British couples who went to the Genetics and IVF Institute in Virginia are believed to have been parents to at least one child or more, and were seeking to give birth to an infant of the opposite sex. The clinic rarely considers taking on childless couples unless they carry genetic disorders that affect only babies of one gender. It describes its work with couples who already have a child of one gender and are now seeking the opposite gender as "family balancing."

Susan Black, a former employee at Guy's Hospital, London, left her job to work at the American clinic. She said she was touched by the British patients she encountered there and cited one couple from north London who were desperately keen to have a girl after giving birth to three boys.

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) is preparing to consult publicly on the topic of choosing the gender of a child, and will consider whether the law should be modified to require licencing of MicroSort. At present, treatments require HFEA approval if they include freezing or donating either sperm or embryos, which MicroSort does not.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: reproductive; technology
...developed for use in cattle.....?
1 posted on 10/17/2002 8:25:58 PM PDT by ladysusan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ladysusan
Nearly all cattle are produced via artificial insemination, and sex selection is a pretty key issue when breeding dairy cows. The process for sorting bovine sperm turned out to work just as well for human sperm, though it requires a much more sensitive sorting gadget (IIRC, because the size difference between X and Y sperm is considerably smaller in human sperm than in bovine sperm).
2 posted on 10/17/2002 9:22:34 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladysusan
The more common way to "choose" you baby's sex in the third world is to get pregnant and abort all the girls...
3 posted on 10/18/2002 3:47:04 AM PDT by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson