Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revenge served cold - Florida Supreme MUST GO on Nov.5 (From Campaign2002 Thread) IMPORTANT
The Associated Press ^

Posted on 10/17/2002 6:45:58 PM PDT by jmstein7

Revenge served cold - Florida Supreme MUST GO on Nov.5 Topeka Capital Journal / Associated Press ^ | 12/14/2000 | Associated Press

Posted on 10/17/2002 10:02 AM Pacific by SES1066

Florida justice Anstead scrutinized The Associated Press 12/14/2000 [A Past Due Reminder]

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- Florida voters have never removed a justice from the state Supreme Court. But Florida justices have never before played such a central role in a close presidential race.

In the aftermath of the historic, five-week legal struggle, conservatives long critical of liberal "judicial activism" have a new target: Justice Harry Lee Anstead, who faces voters in two years.

"The spotlight will be on him, I can guarantee it, no doubt about it," said Republican John Thrasher, a former state House speaker.

Anstead, a Democrat, was one of four justices who voted last week to give Vice President Al Gore the hand counts he sought in his election contest. The U.S. Supreme Court's fractured ruling overturning that decision Tuesday ended the race and gave the White House to George W. Bush.

The three justices who voted with him won't face voters for six years, leaving Anstead the possible lone target for the state's Republican-controlled Legislature, which has been vocal in its disapproval of the decision. Already, a citizens group has formed to call for Anstead's ouster.

"Passions are high," said Patrick Riordan, a history professor at the University of South Florida. "I don't think people are going to forget in two years."

Ken Connor, who failed in an effort to turn out two justices after a 1989 ruling overturned a parental-consent abortion law, isn't so sure.

"That's an eternity in politics," said Connor, now president of the Family Research Council.

Chief Justice Charles Wells is also on the ballot in 2002. All seven justices were appointed by Democratic governors, but Wells seems on surer footing after siding with the minority Friday, writing a passionate dissent immediately quoted by Bush supporters.

Also in the minority were Major B. Harding, who faces voters in 2004, and Leander J. Shaw, set to retire in 2003.

Thrasher won't speculate about Anstead's fate but predicted interest in how Florida's appellate judges get and keep their jobs will stay high -- so high it might be changed.

The seven justices on the Supreme Court and the judges on Florida's five District Courts of Appeal are all appointed by the governor. Every six years the justices and appeals judges face voters in a "merit-retention" election.

Critics may push to change the constitution to have appellate judges elected instead of appointed, Thrasher said.

On Nov. 7, the three justices who joined Anstead in Friday's ruling -- Barbara Pariente, R. Fred Lewis and Peggy Quince -- sailed through their merit-retention elections with nearly three-quarters of the vote.

Susan Johnson, a Winter Park Republican, voted for Bush and to retain the three justices. She said she got down to their names on the ballot and thought to herself, "I'm sure these guys are fine."

Johnson said Wednesday she knows now how wrong she was.

"This is an extremely liberal court. This is an extremely partisan court. This is an activist bench," she said.

This week, Johnson formed an organization called Balance to the Bench with Tampa businessman Sam Rashid. The group wants to increase voters' awareness of judges' records -- and remove Anstead.

"It seems out of balance to me that we have a conservative Legislature, a conservative governor and a conservative Cabinet but an extremely liberal court," Johnson said.

Anstead, 63, was appointed to the Florida Supreme Court in 1994 by then-Gov. Lawton Chiles. He faced voters two years later and breezed through with 68.5 percent of the vote.

But in 2002, Florida voters could be as divided over Anstead as they were over this year's presidential race.

"There will be those who will not want to forget about the activity of the court and the feeling that they overreached and, conversely, there will be those who feel they did the right thing," Thrasher said.

Former Chief Justice Gerald Kogan said he isn't convinced Anstead's job is at risk, calling him "one of the finest justices we've ever had."

"There may very well be a lot more Gore voters in Florida than Bush voters, so it's not like he's universally condemned for this," Kogan said. "As a matter of fact, half the voters in Florida are very happy with him -- and that's more than most justices can say."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: 2000election; anstead; florida; meritretention; supremecourt; wells
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
And DON'T FORGET to FREEP the NJ Dems at:

http://www.njdems.org/contact.htm

1 posted on 10/17/2002 6:45:59 PM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Vote out the Florida Supreme Court Kangaroos.
2 posted on 10/17/2002 6:49:41 PM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
The fact that Former Justice Kogan called Anstead "one of the finest justices we've ever had" is absolutely all you need to know about Harry Anstead. Kogan loves him because Anstead is pretty much a mirror image of Kogan -- especially when it comes to overturning death penalty sentences.
3 posted on 10/17/2002 6:52:12 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
I'm going to say it again. I strongly recommend that people not vote against Wells. He's the most conservative judge we've had on the court in quite a while. Wells is the best, and Anstead is the worst. Concentrate on ousting Anstead!
4 posted on 10/17/2002 6:55:58 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
How cool! One can only hope ...
5 posted on 10/17/2002 6:56:26 PM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Thanks for posting this! It is so important that all Republicans never forget this and vote out Anstead along with Wells!
Hopefully the admin's don't remove this from breaking news.
6 posted on 10/17/2002 6:58:42 PM PDT by inflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amore
I'm sure Jeb will appoint a real conservative in place of Wells, not someone who votes a certain way only because he knows he'll soon be facing the voters.
7 posted on 10/17/2002 7:01:54 PM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Amore
I disagree. They all must go. Wells only dissented after seeing the handwriting on the wall. His first inclination was to allow Al Gore to steal the election. As Chief Justice, wasn't he able to refuse to schedule the case? I say boot him.
8 posted on 10/17/2002 7:05:34 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000; Amore
The question isn't what JEB will do. The question is what McBride will do. Let's get rid of Anstead and leave Wells.
9 posted on 10/17/2002 7:11:06 PM PDT by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
That's what I'm thinking. Even if Wells is a moderate liberal, he's still a danger. I'm willing to take the chance that Jeb will win and then appoint conservative judges.
10 posted on 10/17/2002 7:11:29 PM PDT by inflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat; Rome2000
No, Wells did not have the authority to refuse to hear the case. And, sorry, I don't believe in voting based on a single issue. He's been a very good law & order judge and that's gotten rarer and rarer up there. As for whether a "better" "true conservative" will replace him, don't be so sure. Jeb is restricted in that he has to choose from the candidates the nominating committee sends him. No Republican governor has that great of a track record in appointing conservative judges. Martinez for instance is I think the bonehead who appointed Kogan. And Jeb didn't (but should have) foght for a pick that should have been his alone. Instead, he agreed to co-pick with Chiles, leading to Quince getting the nod, instead of the judge Jeb wanted. I know who a lot of the likely candidates are for any new seat, and I don't see any wonderful choices waiting in the wings.
11 posted on 10/17/2002 7:12:42 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: caltrop
Even so the race may be tight, I still think Jeb will win.
12 posted on 10/17/2002 7:12:52 PM PDT by inflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: inflorida
I wouldn't call Wells a "moderate liberal" by any stretch of the imagination. He's been a rare voice of reason up there -- with, admittedly, one glaring exception.
13 posted on 10/17/2002 7:16:21 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Come to think of it, this really is a pointless exercise. The election is almost here and there has been zip, nada, zilch in the way of a campaign to oust the justices. I had hoped there would be much more effort made. I'll bet they'll be retained easily, albeit by a lesser margin than usual. Maybe somewhere in the 60%'s instead of in the usual 70%'s.
14 posted on 10/17/2002 7:21:19 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7; NormsRevenge
A number of years ago Calif voters fired Chief Justice Rose Bird and her band of revisionist after they over rode every death penalty that came before them.
15 posted on 10/17/2002 7:22:25 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amore
Not quite. If enough of us email these guys, a campaign will be underway in no time:

http://www.newsmax.com/comments.shtml
16 posted on 10/17/2002 7:23:51 PM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
So, email on this page to get the campaign started:

http://www.newsmax.com/comments.shtml
17 posted on 10/17/2002 7:24:27 PM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Amore
Oh no. That's awful news. How could they be forgotten!! I pray something will happen to remove them.
18 posted on 10/17/2002 7:25:17 PM PDT by maranatha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
I know just where the SCOFLAs belong:

The Sunlove Home for the Intellectually Infirm is tucked away in a secluded corner of Lorong Buangkok, surrounded by lush greenery and accessible only by a narrow dirt road.

Straits Times photographer How Hwee Young captures the daily lives of the patients at the The Sunlove Home for the Intellectually Infirm. http://www.straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/mnt/html/stiphotos.html

19 posted on 10/17/2002 7:26:21 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amore
I understand your point but he still was appointed by a democrat and he also voted against Bush during the 2000 election debacle, even if it was only once. The way I see it, he is the lesser of the evils serving on the Florida Supreme Court, but he still needs to go
20 posted on 10/17/2002 7:26:35 PM PDT by inflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson