Skip to comments.
Intel Looks to 1 Billion-Transistor Chip (2007 )
eweek.com ^
| October 16, 2002
| Ken Popovich
Posted on 10/17/2002 8:35:49 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:58:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
SAN JOSE, Calif.--Offering a possible peek at how Itanium processors may look in 2007, a senior Intel Corp. engineer on Tuesday unveiled the blueprint for a 1 billion-transistor processor.
Although he discounted the idea that he was making a product announcement, Intel Fellow John Crawford nevertheless appeared to strongly suggest that his blueprint of a four-core processor would likely be developed to power future computers.
(Excerpt) Read more at eweek.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Technical
KEYWORDS: computers; intel; techindex
To: *tech_index; Mathlete; Apple Pan Dowdy; grundle; beckett; billorites; One More Time; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The cool thing about computers is that there is always a shiny new thing.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
ping
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
01110000011010010110111001100111
5
posted on
10/17/2002 8:47:24 AM PDT
by
thedugal
To: thedugal
Here is the new display in Engineering at Microsoft that will make use of these powerful chips!:
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Does 1 billion transistors = 10,000 MHZ processor speed?
I'm not real computer literate, sorry.
7
posted on
10/17/2002 9:04:57 AM PDT
by
CHATTAB
To: CHATTAB
Does 1 billion transistors = 10,000 MHZ processor speed? No, transistor count is a measure of complexity. For comparison, Intel's current Pentium 4 processor reportedly has about 55 million transistors.
However, more transistors can result in a higher throughput (i.e. accomplish more "work") at a given clock speed.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I think we need to limit the number of transistors on dies. I mean, this one device will have a billion more transistors than existed on the entire planet when the first atomic bomb was dropped, unjustly I might add, on the peace loving people of Japan. What if a terrorist got a hold of one. The horror, the horror. Besides, all the money spend developing this chip could be spent to feed the poor and home the homeless. At least we need to fingerprint there owners, and give them an FBI background check. I'm sure the increased computing power will add to global warming, no blood for oil I always say!!!
Free the Indianapolis 500 !!!!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
imagine playing quake on that puppy!
10
posted on
10/17/2002 10:14:43 AM PDT
by
isom35
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I'm glad I'm no longer in the chip-making business.
11
posted on
10/17/2002 10:32:40 AM PDT
by
blam
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And just think, in a few years Steve the Dell shithe--errr representative will get to announce, "Not only is it a PC, but it can cook eggs and warm up coffee in the morning before class!"
12
posted on
10/17/2002 6:30:35 PM PDT
by
dheretic
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
13
posted on
10/17/2002 6:31:06 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Eat your hearts out, Motorola users.
To: HAL9000
Let me guess ... "I'm sorry, Dave. But I'm afraid Motorola and IBM can't do that ..."
15
posted on
10/18/2002 2:41:48 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Interesting photo.... But I think that guy is going to need a wider mouse pad.
To: Bush2000
Whenever I think about Mac's (which is very rarely), I have a good chuckle about the Mac fan(atic)s' obsession with MS having "stole the idea of windows" from them....
But their own logic, applied to themselves, should mean that the microprocessor is off-limits in the Mac's... After all, Intel invented the microprocessor. Can't Apple, IBM, and Motorola "innovate" something original to run their computers? ;-)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson