Posted on 10/16/2002 4:42:48 PM PDT by Brytani
N. Korea to USA: piss on you
Notice how the libs are shocked that NK ignored this "treaty". Libs are truly children in adult bodies.
And that 'team' should include Nobel 'Peace' Prize winner Jimmy Carter.
Yes it's wrong to hate and there are very few that I do .. However, Both Clinton's are at the top of my list
AP ^ | 2-22-02
BEIJING (AP) -- President Bush softened his "axis of evil" rhetoric in Asia, but his strong words already had gotten North Korea's attention, Secretary of State Colin Powell said Friday. Indeed, North Korea shot back that Bush was "a politically backward child." North Korea issued its angry response as Bush flew back to Washington from a six-day journey to China, South Korea and Japan where his "axis of evil" comment stirred unease or outright opposition.
Former President Carter also criticized Bush's language. "I think it will take years before we can repair the damage done by that statement," Carter said. He called the statement "overly simplistic and counterproductive."
Powell said Bush's remark had had the desired effect. "I'm sure their (the North Koreans') mind is a little more focused than it was a few weeks ago," Powell said on Air Force One, accompanying Bush. .... ...."
Long range missles and nukes, all courtesy of our "friends" in China. GW announce that an attack by NK against the USA and its allies will result in the vaporization of NK and the annihilation of China.
"Urinun Jidae Pyonghwa! Wareware no Jidai ni Heiwa! Peace in our Time!"
What is the Carter Center addresss? (/sarc but half not-kidding)
Carter = fool
Carter's and Clinton's legacies are becoming more clear for history.
NK would be anihilated within a few hours, wouldn't you agree?
33 minutes is the best estimate :-)
I think the left is, generally speaking, locked into one response. Tomorrow will tell if my guess is correct, but here it is: they'll take the position that sure, North Korea has nukes, and (contradicting their earlier position) sure, Saddam has them or nearly so. And there we go beating up on Saddam and not on North Korea. Unfair! Unfair!!
Of course, they'll know as they say it that Bush can call their bluff and reply "OK, you're right, I guess we'll have to intervene there too." The left knows this as well. Their bet will have to be that Bush can't or won't do so, and at the moment that looks like a losing hand.
What will we do? I'm guessing here, too, but it looks like (1) we will intervene in Iraq and we will succeed, and (2) if we do North Korea will do its very best to set a nuke off somewhere to change the rules, otherwise (3) we'll isolate North Korea internationally, attempt to cripple its delivery capacity, and intervene at leisure as we did in Iraq.
[BtD puts away his crystal ball and crosses every digit he possesses...] Of course, it could just as easily turn to poop. And that would be a very, very bad thing.
That's pretty fast ..
Also, says White House spokesman calls this a serious violation. Also says another US gov. spokesman calls this a grave violation of both the NPT agreement AND IAEA Safeguards protocols on nuke development. Said all peace loving nations will line up in alliance with the United States on this issue.... (Yomiuri, breaking, in Japanese).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.