Witnesses under oath, or just someone saying something to someone? But let's say it's true. This occurred after he had landed himself in court regarding his driver's license, etc. Are we saying that this grand constitutional question for which this anarchist biker-for-Jesus is peforming a hunger strike is the reading of the Miranda warning?
That is pretty hysterical, when one considers that among conservatives, the Miranda decision is considered to be a fine example of liberal judicial activism and legislating from the bench.
In that area of the country they have additional rights they recite depending on gender and the nature of the offense. Since he was arrested for a traffic violation they didn't read him his Car-man maranda rights. TRULY a miscarriage of justice.