If he or she has an opinion on the law or the various constitutions that is based on knowledge it certainly wasn't posted on this thread. The total of his/her posts are these:
"Has he been practicing, "No One Knows The Trouble I've Seen" and banging his tin cup on the jail cell bars?"
A block of cases cut and pasted from the ADL site "Militia Watch Dog".
"You may have missed it in the story, but the defendant in question admits to being on a public road, not private property."
"I tell you what: you can drive without a license, if you so choose. If you hit me while driving your (probably unregistered and unlicensed) car, I can and will sue you for every penny you've got--plus you're going to go to jail. But that's your choice, isn't it?"
"Oh, how dire. But it's your choice to drive without a license. It's your choice to go to jail. And if you hit me with your car while driving without a license, I can and will sue you for every penny you have. I will make your life a living hell. Jail, in fact, will be a vacation for you. And that, again, is your choice."
"Actually, I wouldn't have to pay a lawyer. It'd be two pro pers fighting it out. And I would have a ball."
"You can move freely. You can walk, you can jog, you can run, you can ride a bike, you can use a skateboard, scooter or rollerblades. You just can't operate a motor vehicle on a public highway if you don't have a driver's license."
I don't see anything remotely resembling constitutional knowledge in this. Do you? 