The reason I mention his looks is because there have been other comments on the thread regarding toothlessness and his picture has been posted a couple of times. The man's looks have been used to discredit him - he "looks" unbalanced, so he must need "evaluation" - get it? That's why the comment was addressed to you.
My comment about not finding anything obvious about people's motivations and the things people believe applies to everyone, the defendant, the judge, and even you.
I think it would have been fair for the judge to warn the defendant, based upon the courtroom behavior, that he is facing a charge of contempt along with the single felony and two misdemeanor charges if he continues. Once he is set for a test for mental competence, how can the judge allow him to go free on bail - he might be a danger to himself or others, and we won't know until he is tested by a "third party" (this is just speculation about how the system can be abused - see? - so you don't have to come back and say it's unclear why I am saying this to you).
Apparently the budget for Jos. Co. is in dispute. That's fine. But everything in America becomes an industry...and government bureaucracy and ancillary functions (like psychological evaluations, specialists for court testimony, drug testing, and even abortion). Industries integrated into systems of government are open to corruption and abuse - even if they are perfectly "legal" by society's standards.
I suggest you attempt to limit your responses to only those points made by the poster.
I addressed your questions in previous posts (as in my last post to you where I inform you of the concessions I made to IronEagle). I suggest you read someone's comments across an entire thread before trying to jump into the discussion. Otherwise don't complain when someone doesn't respond to you in the way you wanted.