Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rampant spread of sexual disease
thisislondon.co.uk ^ | By Nilufer Atik

Posted on 10/14/2002 7:34:45 AM PDT by krodriguesdc

Rampant spread of sexual disease

By Nilufer Atik, Evening Standard

A 16-year-old girl has been pregnant 10 times since the age of 12, research has revealed.

The girl, who has two young children, is understood to have undergone three abortions and suffered five miscarriages in the last four years.

It is not known whether all 10 pregnancies were by the same man or a string of partners.

Her story came to light when researchers looked into the worrying spread of sexually transmitted diseases among underage girls attending a sexual health clinic in south London.

A doctor made the discovery after being granted access to the girl's medical notes, which would normally be kept private.

Researchers said it was known the girl, who cannot be named, had suffered abuse and had been receiving counselling. Hers was the most shocking case among the 144 underage girls at the clinic they visited.

The study also revealed that girls under 16 were three times more likely to contract sexually transmitted diseases than older women.

One in five had chlamydia, a symptomless disease which can cause infertility, and almost one in 10 had gonorrhoea, which also poses a threat to fertility by damaging fallopian tubes and can increase the chances of suffering an ectopic pregnancy.

The results of the study, conducted at a clinic in Camberwell, have been published in the journal Sexually Transmitted Infection.

The records of all 144 girls aged between 12 and 16 were examined. Dr Sarah Creighton from Camden Primary Care Trust, who led the study, said the findings were very worrying.

She said: "My research hit me in the face. I was completely unprepared for the sexual cases I encountered. It was not just sexual ignorance. They knew that if they didn't use a condom they were at risk of infection.

"We were expecting to see quite high levels of infection because south London has problems with chlamydia and gonorrhoea, but even we were surprised.

"If the younger children had similar levels to older women that would be surprising enough, but they had three times as many."

The girls admitted to doctors at the clinic that less than a quarter of them had used contraception during sex and most of them had become pregnant at least once.

Dr Creighton added: "They were unable to negotiate safe sex - to insist on a condom. What shocked me was the number of girls who came back time and again with another infection or pregnancy.

"The first time may have been through ignorance but by four times we'd hope the message had got through."

Dr Creighton's research indicated that girls were less concerned about keeping clear of infection than they were about keeping a regular sexual partner.

Nuala Scarisbrick, trustee of the charity LIFE, said: "These latest findings make depressing reading but sadly they are what we feared. Children are experimenting with sex, and sexually transmitted diseases are rampant."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: abortion; now; pregnacy

1 posted on 10/14/2002 7:34:46 AM PDT by krodriguesdc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
Eleanor Smeal, Pat Ireland, and the rest of NOW will deny that they are responsible for this type of wanton behavior but if you really think about it sexual promiscuity is what NOW is all about...
2 posted on 10/14/2002 7:37:51 AM PDT by krodriguesdc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
The whole problem of youth is irresponsibility. That's what growing-up is about, learning to be responsible. Yet modern birth control is based on the idea that these adolescents will be responsible when it comes to contraception. These results should surprise no one...
3 posted on 10/14/2002 7:44:55 AM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
Dr Creighton added: ".... What shocked me was the number of girls who came back time and again with another infection or pregnancy.

Why would anyone -- especially a public health professional -- be shocked by this? Talk to any public health nurse, social worker, or any doc who volunteers time in the clinics and you'll hear the same story. Or talk to the lawyers who work the rough end of the street. Or the cops. Once you get them started, all these people will go on and on about how it's the same people, over and over and over.

The problems: self destructive lifestyles; fixation on instant gratification; no long term horizon for life plans; no regard for consequences; an astonishing incapacity to analyze and, therefore, to learn. People like this have always been with us, but they tended to be a self limiting problem: they died off quickly, and provided a formidable example to others. Now the welfare state keeps them alive, so they multiply.

No, I am not a Social Darwinist, but we need to get a lot tougher about tough love in dealing with the underclass.

4 posted on 10/14/2002 7:58:44 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
"we need to get a lot tougher about tough love in dealing with the underclass."

Tough love reinforces the idea that you have done something that is wrong and now you must live with the consequences. For most young people who live in a world that has no consequences they often don't get it and continue to play the blame game. Like blaming their situation on parents, schools, the welfare state or bad boyfriends/girlfriends but the blame never goes back to them and their actions.

Tough love needs to start in the home at about age 3 then about age 13 the kids grasp the signifigance of doing what teenagers should be doing and that is learning skills to prepare them for life not having sex.

That said, your right, but my point is that getting irresponsible kids to grasp this new concept "tough love" sometimes takes quite a few very hard falls.
5 posted on 10/14/2002 8:12:38 AM PDT by BeAllYouCanBe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
Yet modern birth control is based on the idea that these adolescents will be responsible when it comes to contraception.

I agree - what a farce!

but to NOW it just means that we need more social programs to help these promiscous teens

clearly NOW is responsible for misleading people into believing that there is nothing to worry about that the state can't fix...

what a waste of human potential...

6 posted on 10/14/2002 8:32:31 AM PDT by krodriguesdc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BeAllYouCanBe
The good news is that the problem is about to resolve itself. Government revenues have decreased by a whole lot, and good ol' Uncle Sugar is looking at a much emptier sugar barrel than he used to have during the go-go 90's. Seems that a whole lot of people who were working and paying taxes are now not working and not paying taxes. Bad economy and all of that.

In fact, I'm willing to bet that revenues are going to drop so far that the government is going to have to use everything they can get their hands on and then some just to keep their doors open and their legions of paper shufflers in rent money. That means that there is not going to be as much to give away as they had before.

So don't be surprised to see a large part of the "welfare state" cut way back over the next couple of years.
7 posted on 10/14/2002 8:39:57 AM PDT by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
My, hasn't she been busy...?
8 posted on 10/14/2002 11:29:35 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson