Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
Yeah, Isaac Asmiov's "Foundation" series, and his "Three laws of Robotics" were fluff all right. Along with James Blish and his "Cites in Flight."

I will not disagree that Robert Heinlein led the pack, however, at least I admit there are others who were part of an outstanding generation of SF writers. The likes of which we will probably never see again. Sounds to me like you are rather narrow minded in your experience and viewpoint, which makes it easy for me to dismiss you, just as you dismiss the other writers I mention.

74 posted on 10/13/2002 3:11:42 PM PDT by stylin_geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: stylin_geek
"Yeah, Isaac Asmiov's "Foundation" series, and his "Three laws of Robotics" were fluff all right. Along with James Blish and his "Cites in Flight.""

Yup, read'em all. Have'em in my collection of at about 1000 SF and fantasy titles. Compared to Heinlein, Asimov is fluff. Blish is better than Asimov, but still not up to Heinlein. The best thing Asimov wrote was the short story "Nightfall". It comes "close" to matching Heinlein at his best, but for book-length writing, Asimov's writing is almost one-dimensional compared to Heinlein.

Been reading SF for about forty years, and been subscribing to Analog for at least thirty.

"Sounds to me like you are rather narrow minded in your experience and viewpoint, which makes it easy for me to dismiss you, just as you dismiss the other writers I mention."

See paragraph above.

75 posted on 10/13/2002 3:31:29 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson