Skip to comments.
Jimmy Carter, Winner of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize - Is he America's Greatest Ex-President?
self
Posted on 10/11/2002 7:27:58 AM PDT by jstone78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Any thoughts on these or other Presidents, who may have had successful careers after the White House?
1
posted on
10/11/2002 7:27:58 AM PDT
by
jstone78
To: jstone78
{"....Even Nixon had some modest success as a foreign policy consultant after the war...."}
Correction. I intended to say "after Watergate", rather than "after the war".
2
posted on
10/11/2002 7:32:23 AM PDT
by
jstone78
To: jstone78
Whether he's the greatest ex-president or not is a good
topic for debate. I'm just glad he's an ex-president.
3
posted on
10/11/2002 7:36:03 AM PDT
by
Russ
To: jstone78
The greatest ex-President of modern times may also be the one who is arguably our worst President of modern times. I don't mean Jimmy Carter. I mean Richard Nixon.
Carter was, and still is, a buffoon.
To: jstone78
Mother Theressa belived in socialism too. But if her policies had been enacted in India, millions would have been condemned to starvation. To be a saint it takes more than good intentions. It takes productive and beneficial actions. Mr. Carter has done nothing but support our totalitarian enemies, and scold us for not giving more to these dysfunctional societies.
To: jstone78
Carter can now have a Nobel Prize party with Yassar Arafat.
6
posted on
10/11/2002 7:38:22 AM PDT
by
elbucko
To: jstone78
Of course, you also have to look at the organization that awards the Nobel Peace Prize......"great" is their opinion.
Didn't Arafat receive this award once?
To: Russ
I believe Carter is a good Christian and a good, if not misguided, man. However, I find it hard to forgive the damage he did to our country from 1977-81.
To: sultan88; scholar
"No sane parent would want their daughter to work for Clinton, but Carter seems to have his morals in check."No sane lech like Clinton would've wanted Carter's daughter, either.
...no kidding; I *think* I've just had a Zen experience.
9
posted on
10/11/2002 7:42:52 AM PDT
by
Landru
To: jstone78
Teddy Roosevelt became a big game safari hunter for a while, before later making a fool of himself by damaging the Republican Party in 1912.Theodore Roosevelt ALSO won the Nobel Peace Prize for brokering a peace in the Russo-Japanese War.
10
posted on
10/11/2002 7:44:22 AM PDT
by
elbucko
To: jstone78
Jimmy Jumbo is the greatest Democrat president who ever lived! He's the worst compared to any other party.
11
posted on
10/11/2002 7:45:11 AM PDT
by
joyful1
To: jstone78
This is a joke, right??
Best Presidents of the 20th century IMHO: Dwight D. Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan and Theodore Roosevelt.
To: jstone78
I think we need to make a few distinctions about Mr. Carter in judging his "success."
First, there's nothing wrong with any President having a career after the White House, particularly one devoted to public service. And certainly Mr. Carter's pursuits, however misguided they might be, are preferable to Slick Willie's Global Party Tour.
However, it must be noted that Mr. Carter's efforts are nothing more than a continuing effort to rebuild a shattered image. By any standard, Carter was the worst President of the 20th Century. His programs crushed our economy and left our foreign policy in shambles. Since then, Carter has been willing to embrace any dictator and observe any election in an effort to rehabilitate his standing.
Consider his policy "triumphs." Anwar Sadat deserves most of the credit for the Camp David trimuphs. Until Sadat told Walter Cronkite he was willing to go to Tel Aviv and talk peace, there was no U.S. effort to broker a peace deal. In Haiti, it was the presence of Colin Powell, not Jimmy Carter that changed the mind of the dictator Raoul Cedras. When Powell told General Cedras that the 82nd Airborne was enroute and prepared to eliminate him by force, the Haitian dictator had a change of heart. But (again), the liberal media gave the lion's share of credit to Carter.
Ditto North Korea. Pyongyang may embrace Carter, but they fear U.S. military might. Just years after the Gulf War, North Korea--which has studied the U.S. military trimpuh extensively--was unprepared to risk war over the nuclear issue. Talking to Carter gave them a way to strike a deal (and a bad one at that), while maintainng some face.
Carter's two-decade rehabilitation tour is a farce, as is his Nobel Prize. What a shame that the President who did more for World Peace that any other--Ronald Reagan--will never get the recognition he deserves....
13
posted on
10/11/2002 7:46:07 AM PDT
by
Spook86
To: TheBattman
I agree that there are many undeserving people who received the Nobel Prize in the past.
But my guess is that Jimmy Carter was more deserving of the Nobel Prize, than 80 percent of those who were given the award in the past.
14
posted on
10/11/2002 7:46:23 AM PDT
by
jstone78
To: TheBattman
look at the organization that awards the Nobel Peace Prize...The "Committee" is the Mad Hatters Tea Party!
15
posted on
10/11/2002 7:47:59 AM PDT
by
elbucko
To: jstone78
Any thoughts on these or..."There you go again.."
16
posted on
10/11/2002 7:49:43 AM PDT
by
elbucko
To: <1/1,000,000th%
I was talking about ex-Presidents.
The criteria I was using was not what they did in office, but what they did AFTER living office!
17
posted on
10/11/2002 7:49:45 AM PDT
by
jstone78
To: <1/1,000,000th%
Worst president: Jimmy Carter.
Worst man to have become president: Bill Clinton.
President who did the most damage to his country: Lyndon Johnson.
To: jstone78
The Simpsons: Jimmy Carter? He's history's greatest monster!
To: jstone78
I think it's a moot point. If you're President of the United States you have, for 4 or perhaps 8 years, a remarkable influence on history. What you do afterward will inevitably pale in comparison with your influence, for good and for ill, during prime time.
IOW there is no sense in comparing Ronald Reagan's post-retirement accomplishments unfavorably with Jimmy Carter's . . . even though that one letter of Reagan's has been influential in its own way . . .
It would be kind of a "Miss Congeniality Award" . . .
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson