Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Of note, only 4 of the 34 US Senators up for re-election in 2002 voted AGAINST the resolution.

Well, does it mean that Senators do not vote according to their true views anymore? Will 100% votes become a norm? Should we encourage this trend and punish the dissenters?

13 posted on 10/11/2002 5:01:19 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: A. Pole
"Of note, only 4 of the 34 US Senators up for re-election in 2002 voted AGAINST the resolution.

Well, does it mean that Senators do not vote according to their true views anymore? Will 100% votes become a norm? Should we encourage this trend and punish the dissenters?

No, it is merely an attempt to draw a correlation between vote patterns and the upcoming election. Seantors (and all politicians) most often vote the way they think will result in the most constituents voting for them in the next election. When a controversial vote like this comes close to an election, it is interesting to see which way Senators vote and then whether or not it affects their election.

19 posted on 10/11/2002 6:38:48 AM PDT by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson