Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

See Democrap ad against Mike Taylor (R-MT) online (why he dropped out)
The Smoking Gun ^ | 10-10-02 | The Smoking Gun

Posted on 10/10/2002 6:32:46 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative

A Republican candidate today (10/10) dropped out of the Montana Senate race claiming that the state's Democratic party gay-baited him in a new attack ad. The 30-second TV commercial, paid for by the Montana Democratic Party, focuses on allegations that GOP candidate Mike Taylor diverted federal student loans when he ran a Colorado beauty salon/hair care school. The controversial spot uses clips of Taylor from a segment that once ran on a Denver station (and which promoted the Michael Taylor Institute of Hair Design). Taylor contends that the Democratic party's use of the "Beauty Corner" clip was done to insinuate that he was a gay hairdresser. In the spot, Taylor appears to be giving a facial to a male customer. "The ad has destroyed the campaign. We have no money left and we don't want to stoop to the same level," said Alan Mikkelsen, who spoke today to the Billings Gazette. (1 page)

Click here to view the Taylor ad with RealPlayer.


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: miketaylor; montana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 10/10/2002 6:32:47 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
MT Loves MAXY....
He brings Pork....

What a pathetic cheap shot...
he was losing anyways.
2 posted on 10/10/2002 6:39:22 PM PDT by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
I can't stop laughing. I love the music.
3 posted on 10/10/2002 6:40:18 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Publicity stunt. Taylor has received more free publicity than he could have ever hoped for, taken the heat off of the actual charge, and demonized Cleland. When you don't have cash for ads, free publicity is your best recourse, and he was presented with a golden opportunity.

Taking the traditional Rats strategy right to them. Priceless!

4 posted on 10/10/2002 6:41:29 PM PDT by X-Servative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
I'm sorry, but that is hilarious.
5 posted on 10/10/2002 6:46:02 PM PDT by UofORepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Was that a young Tom Daschle in the chair??
6 posted on 10/10/2002 6:55:50 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Thanks for posting that, I was really curious.

I would bet there is some serious pants-soaking going on in Rat circles now that this has gone national. They thought they could just smear Taylor with this but it would never get out of Montana. I hope the Republicans have the stones to call the Rats out on this one, especially to the New York Times, where 3/4 of the newsroom is gay. I want to see them squirm on this one.

I can just imagine the outrage if this had been an ad by a Republican senator against a Democrat challenger. Hoo boy!

7 posted on 10/10/2002 6:59:47 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
"Not the way we do business in Montana".

The whole ad insinuates the guy is gay with the pictures it shows and the 70s porno music in the background. And then they cap it off with "Not the way we do business in Montana". The gaystapo would have already demanded the outright execution of any Republican who OK'd such an ad. But it's a Democrat. I will be surprised if it makes tommorrow's network morning shows.

8 posted on 10/10/2002 7:17:17 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Bump
9 posted on 10/10/2002 7:35:58 PM PDT by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
IF what the democrats allege is true, and if I were running against Taylor, I'd have run that ad. I think it's pretty freaking hilarious!
10 posted on 10/10/2002 8:14:29 PM PDT by Mensch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
You are right about that--but I have heard no one mention whether there's any proof that the charges about him misusing student loan funds is true or not. Has anybody heard anything about that aspect of the ad?
11 posted on 10/10/2002 8:19:23 PM PDT by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
You are right. Republicans would never have gotten away with that. Remember Senator Packwood? He makes a few passes at assistants, tries to make out, lies to the Senate and get thrown out. As he should have been. Clinton has sex in the Oval Office, lies to a grand jury, has credible evidence surface that he raped a woman, and the hard feminist left sticks with him like glue. They standby their man.
12 posted on 10/10/2002 8:24:48 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mensch
If its true, then they have all right to run an ad, but this one (70's porno music and all) definitely hits below the belt. I have two questions: 1) Are the charges true (this matters), and 2) Is he gay (just curious).
13 posted on 10/10/2002 8:34:20 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mensch
Taylor just ran in the wrong state. Be loud and proud man!

He should have moved to California and he'd be governor by now.
14 posted on 10/10/2002 8:40:50 PM PDT by Maximum Leader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

I don't see the big deal. Why didn't the Republicans get a better candidate for this race?

We've got to stop playing "victim" and start kicking A@@. Going down fighting is better than going down like a whiner.

15 posted on 10/10/2002 8:51:29 PM PDT by willgetsome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: basil
You are right about that--but I have heard no one mention whether there's any proof that the charges about him misusing student loan funds is true or not. Has anybody heard anything about that aspect of the ad?

The guy's wife said she filled out the forms and must have made a "clerical error." For him to drop out over this, I'm guessing there might have been just a little bit more going on there than just a "clerical error."

And I gotta hand it to 'em, that WAS a freakin' hilarious commercial.

DTH

16 posted on 10/10/2002 9:55:04 PM PDT by DoveTurnedHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Maximum Leader
ROTFLMAO!!!
17 posted on 10/10/2002 10:03:54 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
A gay spokesman in Montana claims the ad is offensive but blames *Taylor* instead, saying it sends a bad message to run away from the image.

The fairies won't blame the Democrat who ran the ad, oh my no. They blame the victim of the ad for recoiling in horror at the stereotyping.

Personally, if the facts in the ad are true, I find nothing wrong with Baucus running it. But if the queers are upset with the ad, you would think they would want to lash out against the people who put together the ad, not the opponent.

And, I agree with the point that Montana *ought* to be able to come up with a better candidate. Republicans own this state. Baucus ought to be as easy to pick off as the seantors from North Dakota and South Dakota. The GOP has the numbers to win.

18 posted on 10/10/2002 10:20:14 PM PDT by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
"And, I agree with the point that Montana *ought* to be able to come up with a better candidate."

When I move out to Montana (say about 5-6 years at most), I will be sure to give them my name... doesnt seem like I could do much worse.

19 posted on 10/10/2002 10:40:15 PM PDT by Villiany_Inc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Now that Taylor has dropped out....it will be very interesting to see how much of a ruckus the Democratic party puts up if his replacement has a better shot at winning than Taylor had.

This situation has "double edged sword" written all over it.

If they protest too much, then even "Joe and Josephine Six Pack" would be able to begin to understand the hipocracy of these elitist whiney hipocrites.

If they don't protest at all (which I doubt), then they will most likely loose.

Rumor has it that popular Republican ex-Gov Racicot may take the slot...and if he does, then you can pretty much move Montana into the "R" column.

With a chance (albeit slight, but still a chance) that NJ can still go "R" and if Racicot does indeed step into the ring...then we all just might be witness to the biggest muck up in Democartic Party history.

The delicioulsy poetic part of it would be that they would only have themselves to blame.

Just one more thought about all of this...

With the Dems playing the "GAY CARD", I hope that Joe and Josephine also pick up on the fact that there is no cow too sacred to sacrifice when it comes to gaining and maintaining party power.
20 posted on 10/10/2002 11:16:37 PM PDT by crusher999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson