[Rocksalt]

"Helping such people is not government's business, but charity's"

Most charitys are goverment funded,so what's the difference.There is not a drug treatment facility in my area that is not funded by the federal goverment.And as it is,they cannot keep up with the flow of junkies needing treatment.

"If someone breaks into a home and gets shot,that's their own fault too.

Yep."

I agree,but I can't help but have sympathy for the parents of a young person who might end up dead as a result of the perils of narcotics.

"this would end up being really hard on alot parents out there,and causing alot of suffering.

"Not government's business."

Legal narcotics would end up causing alot of suffering for millions of americans,if this ends up coming to fruition,we will just have to accept that,and it will be every man for himself,every family for themselves.

"But I am interested in hearing your idea of how a system of legalized drugs could actually be implemented.

"Repeal existing anti-drug laws."

And what system of dispersal would take it's place? I'm guessing all out anarchy.Really,what do you think would happen if existing laws were suddenly repealed?

[MrLeRoy]

Most charitys are goverment funded

They shouldn't be.

I can't help but have sympathy for the parents of a young person who might end up dead as a result of the perils of narcotics.

I thought it was liberals who held that "sympathy" trumps rights, such as sympathy for the parents of a young person who might end up dead as a result of the perils of handguns.

what system of dispersal would take it's place?

As I say in post 61, the same sort of system that disperses the deadly addictive drug alcohol.