To: Rocksalt
I'm not saying there is anything in the constitution that empowers the goverment to protect us from dangerous things.Good, because there isn't.
I am saying this substance is harmful to our youth,it is a hard drug and that there are laws against making and selling it which might actually make sense.
So you're happy with violating the Constitution? I hope you have the decency to not call yourself a conservative.
31 posted on
10/14/2002 6:41:09 AM PDT by
MrLeRoy
To: MrLeRoy
"I'm not saying there is anything in the constitution that empowers the goverment to protect us from dangerous things.
Good, because there isn't.
"I am saying this substance is harmful to our youth,it is a hard drug and that there are laws against making and selling it which might actually make sense."
"So you're happy with violating the Constitution? I hope you have the decency to not call yourself a conservative."
Where is it in the constitution that there are to be no laws protecting the citizens from reasonable harm?I'm all for reasonable freedoms,but your comments make me think you would favor a lawless society,at least where dangerous drugs are concerned.I'm assuming you would be in favor of legalizing all drugs,requardless of how dangerous they are?
32 posted on
10/14/2002 2:59:12 PM PDT by
Rocksalt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson