just because the SCOTUS decided not to step in here does not establish a precedent that they would not do so in some other case in the future.
"just because the SCOTUS decided not to step in here does not establish a precedent that they would not do so in some other case in the future."
I don't understand how they can legally ignore this case and then step into an exact same case in the future. The only way I could see that happening is if there was a change of bodies on the court.