Posted on 10/06/2002 11:10:44 AM PDT by Destro
Ex-Bosnian officials arrested for terrorisim and espionage walk free, AFP, October1st, 2002.
SARAJEVO, Sept 30 (AFP) - Five former Bosnian Muslim officials arrested on suspicion of terrorism and espionage were released Monday but they remain under investigation, a lawyer said.
The five, arrested in May, include Bakir Alispahic, a former interior minister and former head of the Muslim-led intelligence service (AID), two other former AID officials and two senior police officers.
Alispahic's lawyer, Namik Silajdzic, told AFP all five had been released Monday by the supreme court of Bosnia's Muslim-Croat part.
Silajdzic added that they remained under investigation and that there was no legal deadline for the proceedings to end.
Court officials, who could not produce an indictment after five months of investigation, were not available for comment.
Investigators came under public pressure as Muslim civic associations requested the five to be released, claiming the accusations against them were unfounded.
The Muslim nationalist Party of Democratic Action (SDA) also called for their release and accused the ruling moderate alliance led by the Social democrats of reprisals against former officials.
The court ruling comes as the elections campaign in Bosnia intensifies, less than a week before the vote.
The five former Muslim officials, close to SDA, were suspected of setting up a camp that may have trained and armed terrorists.
The Pogorelica camp, near Fojnica, some 50 kilometers (30 miles) west of Sarajevo, offered military training by Iranian secret service instructors for Bosnian Muslim students.
The NATO-led force deployed in Bosnia since the end of the 1992-95 war, raided the camp in 1996, on suspicion that it was being used as a terrorist training base.
Eight Muslim intelligence officers and three Iranian instructors were arrested during the raid and stocks of arms and booby-trapped children's toys were seized.
That may be so, but his surname was Mihailovich, and official documents spell it with an "i."
Offers made conditional and unworkable.
Both of you need to study up. Didn't happen at all the way you guys make it sound in 1991. Didn't happen PERIOD in 1995.
Now YOU'RE kidding, right? ;)
True, RSK wouldn't go with it in 1991, but the Croats refused to even look at it. Therefore, Serbs were offered no autonomy by Croatia in real terms. There was no real offer on the table from the Croats that they refused. (That's not to say those criminals, Martic and Babic would have accepted it had there been one -- I doubt they would have, the selfish pigs.)
Abosolutely no offer at all was made in 1995. If you're talking aobut that hasty "peace" meeting on 3 August, the Serbs said yes to Z-4, while the Croats, of course, with all those troops massed and a public "green light" from Clinton, said "no way."
The selfish!? pigs thought Serbia was behind them, but they couldn't know there is even a bigger pig then both of them together in Belgrade(SM)!
Serbs had an equal and parallel right to to stay in Yugoslavia by communist-enacted constitution. Either communist-created Croatian laws and borders were valid or were not. Legally, they were valid. Croatia had no right to force Serbs to leave Yugoslavia. Tyranny of a majority was not a legal decision-making process; it is something Croats have accused the Kingdom of Yugoslavia of practicing only to exercise the same thing when it suited them.
If Croatia accepted communist-created borders, then the communist-enacted constitution was equally (in)valid. Period.
You see, Tropoljac, we can't accept one communist creation when it suits us, and demonize it when it doesn't. And don't tell me Croatia changed the Constitution. Croatia seceded unilaterally, unconstitutionally, illegally, and its new Constitution which erased Serbs from it was equally illegitimate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.