Oh please, he's protecting the Presidency. When Bush finally leaves office, he doesn't want to set the president whereby all his pardons will be undone.
You mean precedent?
Well, what's more important, the national security of the U.S. or hurting the "integrity of the Presidency?" I maintain it's the former, and if by exposing the OKC-Iraq connection harm is done to the Presidency by implicating the traitor/rapist/murderer Bill Clinton, then so be it. IMO, it's very unhealthy for Americans to look upon the Presidency as an unassailable institution. The days of King George (of England) are long gone, in case you haven't noticed.