[Reactionary]

"Who knows?" said Specter, adding that he felt Davis' information should not be overlooked."

Yeah, "who knows?" Maybe Specter and the rest of the corrupt fools in Washington will ask the FBI why, if this information is so important, the FBI refused to take the information from Davis in the first place. Or maybe not. Maybe they're too stupid to ask. And maybe, just maybe, the information has already been "overlooked" by the FBI and the rest of the Clinton toads in government.

What the idiot will not ask, however, is why the information was "overlooked" or refused in the first place. That would make the FBI uncomfortable. That would tend to support the theory that they didn't want to know about the terrorists and that they were protecting them.

[justshutupandtakeit]

Yeah, thats the ticket when someone actually addresses the issue that we here have wanted to be looked into for yrs. we don't say "good" but proceed to piss all over them.

Little wonder "conservatives" find it difficult to expand the conservative movement. They are too busy looking for reasons not to welcome allies preferring to stab them in the back or attack their motives.

Oh, but I forgot reactionaries are not conservatives.

[dirtboy]

What the idiot will not ask, however, is why the information was "overlooked" or refused in the first place.

My guess would be that the Iraqi connection was overlooked because Clinton was so intent on pinning the OKC bombing on the right-wingers.