Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
My e-mail to the Sacremento Bee Ombudsman follows:

From: Bigun

To: Ombudsman, Sacremento Bee

Subject: Editorial: Playing by new rules - N.J. follows U.S. court down wrong path

Whoever wrote this editorial has not the FAINTEST clue as to what actually happened in 2000 nor, for that matter, what is happening in New Jersey currently!

The Supreme Court of the United States got involved in Florida ONLY after the Florida Supreme Court unconstitutionally ignored and rewrote the election laws of Florida. The New Jersey court, completely ignoring the rulings of the USSC in that matter, has just done EXACTLY the same thing and ought to be slapped down HARD for so doing!

You OUGHT to INSIST that they correct this IN PRINT ASAP!

Bigun
Huntsville, Texas

26 posted on 10/05/2002 7:50:43 AM PDT by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bigun
Bigun wrote to the Sacramento Bee: "Whoever wrote this editorial has not the FAINTEST clue as to what actually happened in 2000 nor, for that matter, what is happening in New Jersey currently!"

I don't believe this. And I bet you don't either.

The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise aided and abetted by the liberal media. Slowly, Democrats are recognizing this and moving to other parties. The shallowness in this article is an indicator of how far down the reasoning ability of the remaining Democrats (those who read and believe such garbage) has sunk.

My hope is that the SCOTUS will send a detailed inquiry back to the NJSC asking relevant questions to help them clarify whether there is a Constitutional issue. One such question might be: "What is the latest date that the Republican Party may change their candidate?"

Another is: "What is the latest date that the Green Party may change their candidate?"

Others: "How will absentee votes for Torricelli which have already been received be tallied and what mechanism will be used to handle ballots submitted by the same voter at a later time?" "How will the earlier ballot be tallied if no later ballot is received?"

These latter questions address the equal protection issues of election law. And I can hardly wait to hear what the NJSC suggests?

35 posted on 10/05/2002 9:11:02 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson