Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Profiteers resell Africa's cheap Aids drugs
The Guardian ^ | Friday October 4, 2002 | Sarah Boseley and Rory Carroll

Posted on 10/04/2002 4:04:04 PM PDT by dennisw

 

 

Profiteers resell Africa's cheap Aids drugs

Sarah Boseley and Rory Carroll
Friday October 4, 2002
The Guardian


Shipments of low-cost Aids drugs which were intended to save the lives of thousands of impoverished Africans have been intercepted, flown back to Europe and sold at vast profits, it emerged yesterday.

At least $18m (£12m) worth of Combivir and other highly effective antiretroviral drugs made by the British company GlaxoSmithKline is believed to have been hijacked. The drugs were to be sold at significantly discounted prices to clinics in Senegal, Ivory Coast, the Republic of Congo, Togo and Guinea-Bissau under a scheme to offer some drugs at lower prices to poor countries agreed by Glaxo and four other drug companies with the World Health Organisation.

But about 3m doses of Combivir - a third of the supply - was diverted back to Europe by profiteering wholesalers as it arrived at the African airports or even earlier. "There are indications that perhaps some of these batches never even left Europe," said Alan Chandler, a Glaxo spokesman.

The allegations of cynical profiteering by European traders have shocked activists who have been clamouring for more and cheaper Aids drugs for developing countries. At least 6 million HIV-positive people could benefit from the drugs and most of those will die without them.

The latest WHO figures show that only 27,000 have got access to the vital medicines through the two-year-old UN deal called Accelerated Access.

The drugs industry has argued that scams of this kind might happen if prices for expensive drugs were slashed in developing countries and there are fears that some companies may rethink their policy. But Glaxo, which has led the way on price cuts, says it will continue to supply the developing world cheaply.

"We're appalled and saddened to see these traders have been acting in this way, particularly because the victims of the trade are HIV and Aids patients in Africa," Mr Chandler said. "The only beneficiaries are the illegal operators."

The batch numbers of the drugs meant for Africa have been traced. From July last year, it appears they were bought by unsuspecting pharmacists in the Netherlands, Germany and probably the UK at the usual high prices. The Dutch authorities have recalled all batches of Combivir originally intended for Africa.

The diversion of such large quantities of drugs apparently went unnoticed for a year before customs officers in Belgium spotted discrepancies in a shipment sent from Senegal to a Dutch wholesaler which was passing medicines to a second Dutch wholesaler. Seized computer files and shipping records revealed the scale of the scam.

Some 28 shipments were diverted from African countries to Paris and Brussels, then moved to Antwerp, where the customs officers noticed something was amiss. The drugs then moved into the normal wholesale chain and were sold at European prices - up to £3.80 a tablet instead of the 50p Glaxo charges in Africa.

Lax controls and corruption at west African airports are also thought to be a factor. Customs officials, distributors and health ministries are under suspicion because none complained about the shortfall, suggesting sloppy inventory control or complicity.

"The airports tend to be fairly porous. I would think that this sort of corruption can happen without too much of a fuss," said John Tuma, a west African expert at the Institute of Security Studies in Pretoria.

Campaigners accept that this racket was destined to happen. "With such a huge price differential there will be a temptation for profiteering but the tragedy is that it will deny people in need of these drugs," said Jo Nickolls, a South Africa-based policy adviser at Oxfam.

Nathan Ford of Médecins sans Frontières in London called for measures to prevent reimportation such as altering labelling and packaging.

Jonathan Quick, head of the essential medicines division of the WHO, pointed out that one company, Novartis, has given its anti-malarial drug Coartem distinctive packaging in developing countries to differentiate it from the more expensive version, Riamet, which is given to westerners.

Mr Chandler said Glaxo was seeking approval from the regulatory authorities for new packaging. "One didn't think that people would be so evil as to feed this product back into the western world," he said.

Special reports
Aids
Medicine and health

Related articles
08.07.2002: Aids cuts life expectancy to 27
08.07.2002: Aids vaccine 'may be ready within five years'
08.07.2002: Botswana battles against 'extinction'
06.07.2002: Mbeki government ordered to give HIV drug to pregnant women
04.07.2002: Leader: The prices of AIDS medicines must be reduced

Useful links
Aids 2002, Barcelona
Full text: UN report into Aids July 2002
British HIV Association
Terrence Higgins Trust
NHS Direct: HIV/Aids
Elton John Aids Foundation



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/04/2002 4:04:05 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw
These people are taking the this money directly from the pockets on UN officials and UN employees and the activists who extorted the manufacturers in the first place. The profits from the sales of these drugs was to pay the "fees" for being employed by the UN and to pay for the comfortable life style that their families and mistresses require and deserve. The drugs were going to be wasted saving the lives of diseased Africans.
2 posted on 10/04/2002 4:23:17 PM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
They are at war with capitalism and letting the market set its own price. As usual, capitalism wins.
3 posted on 10/04/2002 4:54:06 PM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Anything which is small,easily transported and of high value will be the target of criminal activity and gov't taxation.
4 posted on 10/04/2002 5:47:17 PM PDT by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Once again utopian socialism gets a harsh slap in the face from practical reality.

The solution? According to utopian socialists: more utopian socialism!
5 posted on 10/04/2002 8:10:11 PM PDT by j271
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j271
It would be equally a problem if a charity purchased the medication and sent it to Africa, only to have it stolen and resold in Europe before the recipients could get it. Are you against charity as well?
6 posted on 10/04/2002 8:48:21 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Thanks for the reply.

equally a problem

If it's equally a problem, are the problems equivalent? If so, are they morally equivalent?

7 posted on 10/04/2002 9:25:39 PM PDT by j271
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: j271
Maybe the drug companies' arms were twisted, but it's essentially charity on thair part. Nobody is forcing them to sell in Africa AT ALL.
8 posted on 10/04/2002 10:26:56 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I'm not for forcing the companies to sell anywhere, but I don't see where the African price of these drugs had anything to do with the theft.

These drugs were not bought and resold, they were just plain stolen.
9 posted on 10/05/2002 6:52:31 AM PDT by Freeper 007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: dennisw
Once again, the predictable happens. And Europe is shocked....
11 posted on 10/07/2002 3:10:25 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freeper 007
From the story:

But about 3m doses of Combivir - a third of the supply - was diverted back to Europe by profiteering wholesalers as it arrived at the African airports or even earlier. "There are indications that perhaps some of these batches never even left Europe," said Alan Chandler, a Glaxo spokesman.

Looks to me like the wholesalers bought the stuff, then decided to resell it for a mega profit in Europe. Not quite the same thing as an out-and-out hijacking.

12 posted on 10/07/2002 4:03:25 PM PDT by ArcLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
The "invisible hand" strikes again.
13 posted on 10/07/2002 4:05:02 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArcLight
I agree. From the way it was presented, it looked to me like the sort of "mafia-it-fell-off-the-back-of-the-truck" thing.

But from that line it does look more like it was more of the "Enron-Worldcom-type-ethics" thing.

:- )


14 posted on 10/07/2002 11:42:36 PM PDT by Freeper 007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson