Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC Host Says Death Of Bush Would Be Lucky For World
MSNBC ^ | 10-04-02 | Curtis and Kuby

Posted on 10/04/2002 9:35:36 AM PDT by icwhatudo

While discussing the duel proposed by Iraq between Bush and Saddam, host Kuby stated "Mayebe we will get lucky and get rid of 2 threats to world peace"

Comments to the show welcome:

http://www.msnbc.com/news/CURTISKUBY_Front.asp?0si=-&cp1=1


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: duel; kuby; media; msnbc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-212 next last
To: TC Rider
Despite their unprofessionalism, on all counts, at least we called and had a voice. Took a few seconds of our time and energy and perhaps it will make someone else think twice before making such inflammatory comments.
161 posted on 10/04/2002 11:41:37 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Guess they no longer care what we are thinking.
162 posted on 10/04/2002 11:46:41 AM PDT by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Kuby made the comment several times. He said that by having a duel, the positive result would be the elimination of at least one threat to world peace regardless of the outcome.
163 posted on 10/04/2002 11:51:58 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I think you know exactly what I'm saying, but are just looking for an argument. I suspect that Mason and the other Framers would have scratched their heads over virtual child porn because it simply did not exist at the time the First Amendment was enacted. I also suspect that if they could appreciate the concept of virtual child porn, they would have correctly found that it is not protected speech under the First Amendment. But they may have also frowned upon the virtual child porn law that SCOTUS properly struck down last term, not because the First Amendment protects virtual child porn, but because the statute was so overbroad that it would have resulted in the uncontitutional suppression of protected speech.
164 posted on 10/04/2002 11:54:00 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
#L ?'s actually a third problem with your Daschle analogy, in that Kuby's comments were made over the public airwaves, where additional First Amendment restrictions apply.

Gotta run, have a good one.



165 posted on 10/04/2002 12:00:50 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I've always wondered what's up with the red beanie-thing? Do you know?
166 posted on 10/04/2002 12:05:21 PM PDT by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
MSNBC Americas Newschannel and Fiercely Independent....that is their f-cking slogan. E-mail all of this to FOX News and Bill O right now so he can jump all over this tonight. Outrageous!
167 posted on 10/04/2002 12:43:14 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Yeah, airports are getting to be real police states.
168 posted on 10/04/2002 12:46:58 PM PDT by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: kayak
So because some nutjob out there would take this joke as a command to kill the President, this guy should be arrested? I don't think so, unless you want to establish a police state. There are nutjobs out there who get set off by really random things - e.g. movie violence. Should we ban violent movies? Get real. Nor is he yelling "Fire!" in a theater. He's not inciting any physical violence or disruption. He made a dumb joke, that's the bottom line, and the fact that you're taking it so seriously is the really amusing thing.

(You know, there's a joke that we should settle wars by having the leader of each country fight each other in a ring. Should anyone repeating this joke be arrested as a "terrorist" making threats against our Dear President?)
169 posted on 10/04/2002 12:51:44 PM PDT by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
An even bigger shame is that Kuby's conservative counterpart is Curtis Sliwa, who probably does the show with that silly red beret of his.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. The red beret is a little over the top. But Sliwa is right on most of the issues.
170 posted on 10/04/2002 1:06:22 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
It is outrageous and should be publicly apologized for by the station management. But that won't happen. Furthermore, you won't see the President run to a mic (like little Tommy D.) to demand an apology.....
171 posted on 10/04/2002 1:09:52 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: OReilly
I will be outraged if the Secret Service softballs this.

Prepare to be outraged. I predict that not a darn thing comes of this.

172 posted on 10/04/2002 1:15:58 PM PDT by Denver Ditdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SirFishalot
The girl said that "MSNBC personalities represent all different sides of an issue."

I asked "does that include sides endorsing the murder of our President."

She said "All sides"

The proper response to such a statement would be: "So, which of your on-air personalities endorse the murder of the Reverends Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson?"

The answer to that, I'd bet, would be < click >.

173 posted on 10/04/2002 1:26:20 PM PDT by Denver Ditdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages
There has GOT to be something illegal abut this. :(
174 posted on 10/04/2002 1:28:03 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Just go to the secret service website and let them know what you thought of his "joke" and "statement" on the life of the President. I did. This goes beyond free speech.
175 posted on 10/04/2002 1:29:43 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
BTW, what's "ignornance?"

C'mon, Sabretooth, didn't you just take Poobah to task for "Death by typo" on another thread? ;)

176 posted on 10/04/2002 1:30:35 PM PDT by Denver Ditdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
There has GOT to be something illegal abut this. :(

It is illegal to make or promote threats to the president's life. The Secret Service could arrest this guy. But sadly, they probably won't.
177 posted on 10/04/2002 1:32:44 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
"PONYTAILS"HA!
178 posted on 10/04/2002 1:52:58 PM PDT by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
I think he will have a hard time after this horrendous remark about our great President. This person isnt good enough to lick the bottom of our President's shoe.
179 posted on 10/04/2002 1:55:48 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Teacup
Oh my God...thanks for posting that photo. Now I know who this creep is. I never knew his name though. What a waste product.
180 posted on 10/04/2002 1:56:49 PM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-212 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson