Posted on 10/03/2002 4:57:39 PM PDT by greydog
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:45:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Well, that seems pretty speculative to me. Seems to me that if one Robert Toricelli were to win (yeah, right), then he's Won the Election... The dems don't get to appoint Lautenberg in his place, Torch WOULD BE the Senator.
Regardless, it just seems to me that the Democrats argued in Missouri that the Ballot was not "vacant" even if the candidate was dead.
Whereas in New Jersey, they want to "take a mulligan" even when the Candidate is still alive (biologically, that is).
Reeking self-interested double-standard.
I'm not sure that matters anymore.
I always wondered who the NYT's parent company was....
Fascism is simply corrupt socialism, aka Democrat Party of the 21st Century. Power at ant cost. The Politburo is in control and thriving under the corrupt theory of a "living Constitution".
When felonious perjury is nationally dismissed, when we are unable to define IS, and oral sex performed on the president of the United States becomes a topic of the evening news (after all, it isnt really sex you know)...
The death of the Rule of Law becomes inevitable -- much to our chagrin.
Agreed, but I am curious about your choice of the demarcation line of 70 years? Something in the early 30's = FDR?
One test for which type of person you are is this word problem. Say you are driving in the middle of the desert. You can see many miles in all directions. There is absolutely no one around. Then you come to a cross road. The road you are on has a stop sign. Now, you can see down both directions of the cross road and there is no traffic. Do you stop, or do you just drive right on through.
The rules (law) says you should stop first. I would be willing to bet if you had a secret camera filming this intersection, most would stop, but I am just as sure there are those that will do the calculations and decide there is no cost to disobey this rule, and will continue without stopping.
So for most of us, doing the right thing is enough to keep us honest, but for some there needs to be a penalty for breaking the rules, and that is what is missing in politics today. There are very few that are held accountable, and that is where I hold the suppose free press accountable. However, the lack of coverage from the media does not absolve us the voters of our responsibility to hold the politicians to a high standard, and I think as Republicans we do a better job then Democrats, but even we are not perfect in this regard.
And so to your question, what happen to the Rule of Law, it is there, as always, it just has to be enforced.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.