Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did Monongahela Indians Disappear From Western Pennsylvania?
Northern Light ^ | 10-2-2002

Posted on 10/03/2002 2:54:16 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 10/03/2002 2:54:16 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
Cool article, but I'm certain the data will be used by the Greens for dire purposes.
2 posted on 10/03/2002 2:57:16 PM PDT by Notforprophet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Al Gore addressed this in "Earth in the Balance". It was global warming from the steel mills that drove them out.
3 posted on 10/03/2002 2:57:22 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Gosh, you mean there were factors that influenced Amerind populations besides the evil Europeans? </SARCASM>

Interesting article!

4 posted on 10/03/2002 2:59:38 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I'm more prone to accept the disease theory. IIRC, it's pretty well documented that the Eastern coastal Indians died off in droves at around the time of the Pilgrims (1620). (Weren't you part of that thread a couple of weeks back?)

We know there was contact between tribes -- easy to see them being taken out by a plague, especially since we know such things happened. It's far harder to imagine a drought doing it to them, especially in a valley where the rivers did not run dry.

5 posted on 10/03/2002 3:03:13 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Wow! Pittsburgh was uninhabited altogether? Makes one wonder why the French and the Brits were fighting out there.
6 posted on 10/03/2002 3:04:29 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Contagious disease is more lethal in populations under stress from other factors, notably starvation.
7 posted on 10/03/2002 3:07:54 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
DONATE TODAY OR.....
MEET BIFF...
YOUR NEW ADMIN MODERATOR!
Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic
LLC PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

8 posted on 10/03/2002 3:08:14 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
They suddenly realized how close they were to NJ and NY...
9 posted on 10/03/2002 3:10:53 PM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
It's far harder to imagine a drought doing it to them, especially in a valley where the rivers did not run dry.

I agree. It wasn't like there were millions of Indians there --- maybe 10,000 at best, and it's doubtful they would be farming or even settle far from the rivers. The 'bottom land' was the only easily tillible soil in that region. Every thing else was far to rocky or clay filled for an age without horses and steel plows. Even in the times when the rivers would get very low in the summer, (before damns and reservoirs) I can't imagine the rivers that drain nearly all the land west of the Appalachians from New York state to North Carolina ever running totally dry.

10 posted on 10/03/2002 3:18:35 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Notforprophet
Cool article, but I'm certain the data will be used by the Greens for dire purposes.

Yep. They surely won't come to their senses and follow that splinter of The Sierra Club
that was agitating to support at least a decrease in the annual migration into the USA.

Funny, only Osama's actions can cause some sanity to occur at the borders...but not enough.
11 posted on 10/03/2002 3:23:26 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
It was my Iroquian ancestors that drove them out - they were in the way ;0)
12 posted on 10/03/2002 3:23:39 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
I can't imagine the rivers that drain nearly all the land west of the Appalachians from New York state to North Carolina ever running totally dry.

The question is did they irrigate using the river? If they didn't it wouldn't matter if it were flowing or not.

a.cricket

13 posted on 10/03/2002 3:27:15 PM PDT by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
Their leaders kept changing election rules, just before the big pow-wow.

14 posted on 10/03/2002 3:29:42 PM PDT by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Why Did Monongahela Indians Disappear From Western Pennsylvania?

Didn't they all go back to Wales?

</silly_comments>

15 posted on 10/03/2002 3:30:05 PM PDT by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Perhaps of collateral interest was a column that Patrick Michaels of The Cato Institute
did about the drought of 1930, as well as older historical droughts.

It's over at this URL:
http://www.cato.org/research/articles/michaels-020901.html
16 posted on 10/03/2002 3:31:31 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
"I'm more prone to accept the disease theory. IIRC, it's pretty well documented that the Eastern coastal Indians died off in droves at around the time of the Pilgrims (1620). (Weren't you part of that thread a couple of weeks back?)"

Yes. The tree rings don't tell lies. Probably a combination of things.

17 posted on 10/03/2002 3:32:01 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
Unpaid gambling debts.
18 posted on 10/03/2002 3:32:26 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Red Flight?
19 posted on 10/03/2002 3:35:19 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
"I agree. It wasn't like there were millions of Indians there --- maybe 10,000 at best."

I have been persuaded recently that when the modern Europeans discovered South America, that there were more people there than all of Europe. N/A, don't know?

20 posted on 10/03/2002 3:41:22 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson